ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2018
Renitence vacuoles facilitate protection against phagolysosomal damage in activated macrophages.
Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on the Role of Galectin-3 in Sepsis.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- High-throughput marker-free screening of cytoplasmic vacuoles in adherent cells via Fourier ptychographic microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Macrophage inflammatory state influences susceptibility to lysosomal damage.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2022Article
- Maintenance and loss of endocytic organelle integrity: mechanisms and implications for antigen cross-presentation.Open biology · 2021Review
- Monocytes Expose Factor XIII-A and Stabilize Thrombi against Fibrinolytic Degradation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Epimedokoreanin C, a prenylated flavonoid isolated fromAmerican journal of cancer research · 2021Article
- Early Interaction of Alternaria infectoria Conidia with Macrophages.Mycopathologia · 2019Article
- Macropinosomes as units of signal transduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As professional phagocytes, macrophages are susceptible to endolysosomal membrane damage inflicted by the pathogens and noxious particles they ingest. Whether macrophages have mechanisms for limiting such damage is not well understood. Previously, we reported a phenomenon, termed "inducible renitence," in which lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activation of macrophages protected their endolysosomes against damage initiated by the phagocytosis of silica beads. To gain mechanistic insight into the process, we analyzed the kinetics of renitence and morphological features of LPS-activated versus resting macrophages following silica bead-mediated injury. We discovered novel vacuolar structures that form in LPS-activated but not resting macrophages following silica bead phagocytosis. Because of their correlation with renitence and damage-resistant nature, we termed these structures "renitence vacuoles" (RVs). RVs formed coincident with silica bead uptake in a process associated with membrane ruffling and macropinocytosis. However, unlike normal macropinosomes (MPs), which shrink within 20 min of formation, RVs persisted around bead-containing phagosomes. RVs fused with lysosomes, whereas associated phagosomes typically did not. These findings are consistent with a model in which RVs, as persistent MPs, prevent fusion between damaged phagosomes and intact lysosomes and thereby preserve endolysosomal integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.