Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282211›Full record

ArticleCirculation research2018

Late Ca

Ewan D Fowler, Cherrie H T Kong, Jules C Hancox, Mark B Cannell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ca2+ signalling in cardiac muscle: the importance of balances.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Improved CaJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Arrhythmogenic late CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. NCX-Mediated Subcellular CaBiophysical journal · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ewan D FowlerFrom the School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, United Kingdom.
Cherrie H T KongFrom the School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, United Kingdom.
Jules C HancoxFrom the School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, United Kingdom.
Mark B CannellFrom the School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, United Kingdom. mark.cannell@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/12/10/29802Medical Research Council MR/N002903/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe development of a refractory period for Ca

objectiveTo investigate the possibility of late Ca METHODS AND

resultsWe recorded Ca

conclusionsThese new types of Ca

Indexed as

Calcium SignalingAction PotentialsAnimalsCalciumCalcium Channels, L-TypeExcitation Contraction CouplingMicroscopy, ConfocalMyocytes, CardiacRabbitsSodium-Calcium ExchangerSystoleCalciumCalcium Channels, L-TypeSodium-Calcium Exchangeraction potentialcardiac myocytesheartheart muscle cellsodium–calcium exchanger

Identifiers

PMID29282211
PMCPMC5796647
OpenAlexW2781451144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.