Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282135›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2017

IMPlementation of A Relatives' Toolkit (IMPART study): an iterative case study to identify key factors impacting on the implementation of a web-based supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar experiences in a National Health Service: a study protocol.

Fiona Lobban, Victoria Appleton, Duncan Appelbe, Johanna Barraclough, Julie Bowland, Naomi R Fisher, Sheena Foster, Sonia Johnson, Elizabeth Lewis, Céu Mateus and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona LobbanSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK. f.lobban@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-4350
Victoria AppletonSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Duncan AppelbeClinical Trials Research Centre, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Bld 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Johanna BarracloughDoctorate in Clinical Psychology Programme, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Julie BowlandSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Naomi R FisherSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Sheena FosterSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, London, W1T 7BN, UK.
Elizabeth LewisSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Céu MateusDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University Furness College, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Barbara MezesSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Elizabeth MurrayResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Puffin O'HanlonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Vanessa PinfoldThe McPin Foundation, 32-36 Loman Street, London, SE1 0EH, UK.
Jo Rycroft-MaloneBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, College Road, Bangor, LL572DG, UK.
Ron SiddleCumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Penrith, UK.
Jo SmithInstitute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK.
Chris J SuttonLancashire Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.
Andrew WalkerSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Steven H JonesSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Centre for Mental Health · GBFurness College · GBUniversity College London · GBBangor University · GBMcPin Foundation · GBNorth Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Worcester · GB

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/04/16Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 14/04/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeb-based interventions to support people to manage long-term health conditions are available and effective but rarely used in clinical services. The aim of this study is to identify critical factors impacting on the implementation of an online supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with recent onset psychosis or bipolar disorder into routine clinical care and to use this information to inform an implementation plan to facilitate widespread use and inform wider implementation of digital health interventions.

methodsA multiple case study design within six early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services in England, will be used to test and refine theory-driven hypotheses about factors impacting on implementation of the Relatives' Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT). Qualitative data including behavioural observation, document analysis, and in-depth interviews collected in the first two EIP services (wave 1) and analysed using framework analysis, combined with quantitative data describing levels of use by staff and relatives and impact on relatives' distress and wellbeing, will be used to identify factors impacting on implementation. Consultation via stakeholder workshops with staff and relatives and co-facilitated by relatives in the research team will inform development of an implementation plan to address these factors, which will be evaluated and refined in the four subsequent EIP services in waves 2 and 3. Transferability of the implementation plan to non-participating services will be explored. DISCUSSION: Observation of implementation in a real world clinical setting, across carefully sampled services, in real time provides a unique opportunity to understand factors impacting on implementation likely to be generalizable to other web-based interventions, as well as informing further development of implementation theories. However, there are inherent challenges in investigating implementation without influencing the process under observation. We outline our strategies to ensure our design is transparent, flexible, and responsive to the timescales and activities happening within each service whilst also meeting the aims of the project.

trial registrationISCTRN 16267685 (09/03/2016).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalFamilyInternetBipolar DisorderHealth EducationHumansPatient Care TeamPsychotic DisordersResearch DesignSelf-ManagementState MedicineStress, PsychologicalUnited KingdomBipolarCase seriesDigital psychosisEarly intervention servicesImplementationMental healthRelativesWeb-based

Identifiers

PMID29282135
PMCPMC5745602
OpenAlexW2777255531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.