Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282131›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

Cybathlon experiences of the Graz BCI racing team Mirage91 in the brain-computer interface discipline.

Karina Statthaler, Andreas Schwarz, David Steyrl, Reinmar Kobler, Maria Katharina Höller, Julia Brandstetter, Lea Hehenberger, Marvin Bigga, Gernot Müller-Putz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. JNER at 15 years: analysis of the state of neuroengineering and rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karina StatthalerInstitute of Neural Engineering, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Andreas SchwarzInstitute of Neural Engineering, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria.
David SteyrlInstitute of Neural Engineering, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Reinmar KoblerInstitute of Neural Engineering, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Maria Katharina HöllerInstitute of Neural Engineering, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Julia BrandstetterGraz BCI Racing Team MIRAGE91, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Lea HehenbergerInstitute of Neural Engineering, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Marvin BiggaGraz BCI Racing Team MIRAGE91, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Gernot Müller-PutzInstitute of Neural Engineering, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, 8010, Graz, Austria. gernot.mueller@tugraz.at.ORCID 0000-0002-0087-3720
Graz University of Technology · AT

Funding

European Research Council (BE) 681231Horizon 2020 643955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this work, we share our experiences made at the world-wide first CYBATHLON, an event organized by the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH Zürich), which took place in Zurich in October 2016. It is a championship for severely motor impaired people using assistive prototype devices to compete against each other. Our team, the Graz BCI Racing Team MIRAGE91 from Graz University of Technology, participated in the discipline "Brain-Computer Interface Race". A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a device facilitating control of applications via the user's thoughts. Prominent applications include assistive technology such as wheelchairs, neuroprostheses or communication devices. In the CYBATHLON BCI Race, pilots compete in a BCI-controlled computer game.

methodsWe report on setting up our team, the BCI customization to our pilot including long term training and the final BCI system. Furthermore, we describe CYBATHLON participation and analyze our CYBATHLON result.

resultsWe found that our pilot was compliant over the whole time and that we could significantly reduce the average runtime between start and finish from initially 178 s to 143 s. After the release of the final championship specifications with shorter track length, the average runtime converged to 120 s. We successfully participated in the qualification race at CYBATHLON 2016, but performed notably worse than during training, with a runtime of 196 s. DISCUSSION: We speculate that shifts in the features, due to the nonstationarities in the electroencephalogram (EEG), but also arousal are possible reasons for the unexpected result. Potential counteracting measures are discussed.

conclusionsThe CYBATHLON 2016 was a great opportunity for our student team. We consolidated our theoretical knowledge and turned it into practice, allowing our pilot to play a computer game. However, further research is required to make BCI technology invariant to non-task related changes of the EEG.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesSelf-Help DevicesUser-Computer InterfaceHumansMalePersons with DisabilitiesBrain-computer Interface (BCI)CYBATHLONElectroencephalogram (EEG)Mental imageryStroke

Identifiers

PMID29282131
PMCPMC5745791
OpenAlexW2776198882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.