Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282125›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2017

Food restriction during pregnancy and female offspring fertility: adverse effects of reprogrammed reproductive lifespan.

Abdel Halim Harrath, Abdulkarem Alrezaki, Lamjed Mansour, Saleh H Alwasel, Stefano Palomba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Potential downsides of calorie restriction.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fetal programming:Aging · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Caloric restriction in female reproduction: is it beneficial or detrimental?Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdel Halim HarrathZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. hharrath@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2170-1303
Abdulkarem AlrezakiZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lamjed MansourZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh H AlwaselZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Stefano PalombaUnit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "Bianchi - Melacrino - Morelli", Reggio Calabria, Italy.

Funding

deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University RGP-164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood restriction during pregnancy can influence the health of the offspring during the adulthood. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of maternal food restriction (MFR) on the reproductive performance in female rat offspring from the first (FR1) and second (FR2) generations.

methodsAdult virgin Wistar female rats were given free access to tap water and were fed ad libitum on standard rodent chow, were mated with virgin adult males, and then were randomly divided into two groups: controls (that was fed ad libitum ) and food-restricted group (FR, that was given only 50% of ad libitum food throughout gestation). Their first (FR1) and the second (FR2) generation of offspring were fed ad libitum and sacrificed before puberty and at adulthood. Their ovaries were removed and their histology evaluated by estimating the number of follicles (total and at various stages of folliculogenesis), and the presence of multi-nuclei oocytes and multi-oocyte follicles.

resultsTotal number of ovarian follicles was lower in FR1 females at week 4 in comparison with controls, while it was not different in FR2 females vs. CONTROLS: The number of the primordial follicle was lower in FR1 and FR2 females vs. controls at both week 4 and at week 8. When compared to the controls, the follicles containing multi-nuclei oocytes were more frequent in ovaries from FR1 and FR2 females at week 4, and higher and lower respectively in ovaries form FR1 and FR2 females at week 8.

conclusionMFR affects ovarian histology by inducing the development of abnormal follicles in the ovaries in first and second generation offspring. This finding could influence the ovarian function resulting in an early pubertal onset and an early decline in reproductive lifespan.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionFertilityPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsFemaleMaternal ExposureOocytesOrgan SizeOvarian FollicleOvaryPregnancyRatsReproductionFollicleFood restrictionOocyteOvaryPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29282125
PMCPMC5745764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.