Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282107›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2017

Thoracic ultrasound for pleural effusion in the intensive care unit: a narrative review from diagnosis to treatment.

E Brogi, L Gargani, E Bignami, F Barbariol, A Marra, F Forfori, L Vetrugno

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05631756 ("Correlation Between PaO2/FiO2 and Lung Ultrasound Score in Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit With Interstitial Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05631756 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

"Correlation Between PaO2/FiO2 and Lung Ultrasound Score in Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit With Interstitial Syndrome: A Prospective Physiological Study"

TypeinterventionalSponsorCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de LouvainRan2023 to 2025Enrolled86ConditionsInterstitial Lung DiseaseArmsLung Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Recommendations for Lung Ultrasound in Internal Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

E BrogiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy. etruscabrogi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-7941
L GarganiInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
E BignamiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
F BarbariolDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
A MarraDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
F ForforiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
L VetrugnoDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Udine · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleural effusion (PLEFF), mostly caused by volume overload, congestive heart failure, and pleuropulmonary infection, is a common condition in critical care patients. Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) helps clinicians not only to visualize pleural effusion, but also to distinguish between the different types. Furthermore, TUS is essential during thoracentesis and chest tube drainage as it increases safety and decreases life-threatening complications. It is crucial not only during needle or tube drainage insertion, but also to monitor the volume of the drained PLEFF. Moreover, TUS can help diagnose co-existing lung diseases, often with a higher specificity and sensitivity than chest radiography and without the need for X-ray exposure. We review data regarding the diagnosis and management of pleural effusion, paying particular attention to the impact of ultrasound. Technical data concerning thoracentesis and chest tube drainage are also provided.

Indexed as

DrainageHumansIntensive Care UnitsLungPleural EffusionThoracentesisUltrasonographyCathetersCritical careLungPleural effusionUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29282107
PMCPMC5745967
OpenAlexW2777663378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.