Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282105›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2017

Risk factors for predicting increased surgical drain output in patients after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Jinqian Liang, Jianhua Hu, Chong Chen, Hao Yin, Fangliang Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Predicting intraoperative blood loss using cervical vertebral bone quality scores in cervical corpectomy and fusion procedure.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinqian LiangDepartment of Orthorpaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jianhua HuDepartment of Orthorpaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. hujianhuapumch@126.com.
Chong ChenDepartment of Orthorpaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Hao YinDepartment of Spine Union, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, No.61 Jiefangxi Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410005, People's Republic of China.
Fangliang DongDepartment of Spine Union, Puyang Anyang Area Hospital, No.260 Dengta Road, Anyang, Henan, 455000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough measures to reduce and treat the postoperative surgical drain output are discussed, along with the increased interest in causative factors related to the prevention and treatment reported by many studies, these are still controversial.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on a consecutive series of 217 patients who had underwent ACCF between January 2016 and March 2017. Patients were categorized based on normal or increased total drain output. These two groups were compared for demographic distribution and clinical data to investigate the predictive factors of increased drain output by multivariate analysis.

resultsThe overall incidence rate of increased drain output after ACCF was 16.6%. There are no significant differences in sex, BMI, history of taking aspirin, and ASA classification between the two groups (P > 0.05). Of the patients with increased drain output, a significantly higher proportion of patients have OPLL in the surgical level, 18 (50.0%) versus 33 (18.2%) (P = 0.000). The mean age was 60.67 ± 8.18 years versus 54.41 ± 10.05 years (P = 0.001). Number of discs involved was 2.42 ± 0.50 versus 2.02 ± 0.65 (P = 0.001). Operation time was 112.22 ± 16.49 min versus 105.21 ± 17.89 min (P = 0.031). Intraoperative blood loss was 109.86 ± 62.02 mL versus 87.83 ± 56.40 mL (P = 0.036). Logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR, 1.075; p = 0.003), history of smoking (OR, 2.792; p = 0.021), OPLL in surgical level (OR, 2.107; p = 0.001), and number of discs involved (OR, 2.764; p = 0.003) maintained its significance in predicting likelihood of increased surgical drain output.

conclusionsThe occurrence of increased drain output after ACCF is most likely multifactorial and is related to age, history of smoking, OPLL in surgical level, and number of discs involved.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCervical VertebraeCohort StudiesDiskectomyDrainageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpinal FusionAnterior cervical corpectomy and fusionRetrospective studyRisk factorsSurgical drain output

Identifiers

PMID29282105
PMCPMC5745894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.