ArticleImplementation science : IS2017
Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Conceptual and practical challenges associated with understanding patient safety within community-based mental health services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- Implementing after action review in an Irish tertiary hospital: a mixed-methods evaluation of safety culture and second victim experience and support.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Do patient safety incident investigations align with systems thinking? An analysis of contributing factors and recommendations.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Beyond the report: a qualitative exploration of safety incidents in maternity services.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Exploring a root cause analysis team's experience with involving patients and next of kin after a sentinel event.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Rethinking learning from incidents in healthcare: a Safety-II model integrating work-as-imagined, work-as-done, and work-as-experienced.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Integrating equity into incident reporting and patient concerns systems: a critical interpretive synthesis.BMJ quality & safety · 2025Review
- Engineering Safe Care Journeys: Designing a Patient Safety Passport.Journal of patient safety · 2025Article
- Perceptions and Experiences of Consumer Representatives on Patient Safety Investigation Teams: A Qualitative Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Systems analysis of clinical incidents: development of a new edition of the London Protocol.BMJ quality & safety · 2025Review
- Reconciling Safety and Safeguarding in Health and Social Care: Implications for Just Culture.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 'They Take the Mum Off You When You Come In': An Ethnographic Study of Parent Experiences of Medicines Safety Systems in English Hospitals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Decades of failure to prevent harm to patients-where are we going wrong? A mixed methods study of the perspectives of health services staff across Australia and internationally.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Requirements for effective investigation and learning after suicide: the views of persons with lived experience and professionals.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Clinical Informatics Team Members' Perspectives on Health Information Technology Safety After Experiential Learning and Safety Process Development: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Humanising processes after harm part 2: compounded harm experienced by patients and their families after safety incidents.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- What are the experiences of team members involved in root cause analysis? A qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Characterization of Safety Events Involving Technology in Primary and Community Care.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Applying an equity lens to hospital safety monitoring: a critical interpretive synthesis protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvery safety-critical industry devotes considerable time and resource to investigating and analysing accidents, incidents and near misses. The systematic analysis of incidents has greatly expanded our understanding of both the causes and prevention of harm. These methods have been widely employed in healthcare over the last 20 years but are now subject to critique and reassessment. In this paper, we reconsider the purpose and value of incident analysis and methods appropriate to the healthcare of today. MAIN TEXT: The primary need for a revised vision of incident analysis is that healthcare itself is changing dramatically. People are living longer, often with multiple co-morbidities which are managed over very long timescales. Our vision of safety analysis needs to expand concomitantly to embrace much longer timescales. Rather than think only in terms of the prevention of specific incidents, we need to consider the balance of benefit, harm and risks over long time periods encompassing the social and psychological impact of healthcare as well as physical effects. We argued for major changes in our approach to the analysis of safety events: assume that patients and families will be partners in investigation and where possible engage them fully from the beginning, examine much longer time periods and assess contributory factors at different time points in the patient journey, be more proportionate and strategic in analysing safety issues, seek to understand success and recovery as well as failure, consider the workability of clinical processes as well as deviations from them and develop a much more structured and wide-ranging approach to recommendations.
conclusionsPrevious methods of incident analysis were simply adopted and disseminated with little research into the concepts, methods, reliability and outcomes of such analyses. There is a need for significant research and investment in the development of new methods. These changes are profound and will require major adjustments in both practical and cultural terms and research to explore and evaluate the most effective approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.