Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282055›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2017

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of community pharmacists on generic medicines in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.

Naser Y Shraim, Tasneem A Al Taha, Rawan F Qawasmeh, Hiba N Jarrar, Maram A N Shtaya, Lama A Shayeb, Waleed M Sweileh

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the Use of Mobile Health Applications in Palestinian Community Pharmacy Practice.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naser Y ShraimDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. shraim.n@gmail.com.
Tasneem A Al TahaDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Rawan F QawasmehDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Hiba N JarrarDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Maram A N ShtayaDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Lama A ShayebDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Waleed M SweilehDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneric substitution in several countries has become a common practice. Besides, it is considered as a major cost minimizing strategy meant to contain pharmaceutical expenditure without compromising healthcare quality. However, the safety and quality issues of generic products are of top concerns of general practitioners and health work professionals. This study aimed to investigate community pharmacist's knowledge, attitudes and practices toward generic medicines in Palestine.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional observational study employing a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was of four main sections: demographic and practice details of the participants, knowledge, attitudes and the influencing factors related to selection and dispensing of generic medicines. A convenience sampling technique was implemented in this study in which the data collection form was distributed in West Bank- Palestine among a set of practicing pharmacists. Mann-Whitney-U or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to comparison of different issues as appropriate. P-values of <0.05 were considered significant.

resultsA total of 302 community pharmacists were interviewed, slightly more than half were males (52.3%). The mean knowledge score of participants regarding generic medicines was (5.91 ± 1.27) where the highest score was 8 of 10. Knowledge score was not significantly influenced by any of the socio-demographic characteristics. Our data showed that most of included pharmacists in the study (95.4%) agreed that health authorities should implement bioequivalence policies prior to marketing approval of generics, while 87.4% of participants agreed that they should be given the right to substitute generics and the majority (62.3%) support generic substitution for brand name drugs in all cases when a generic is available The main two factors affect pharmacists' selection and dispensing of generic medicines are personal faith in the product (86.1%) and cost effectiveness of generic medicines (84.1%).

conclusionsGeneric medicines substitution among pharmacists is widespread and prevalent. Our data found that participant pharmacists in Palestine had basic knowledge with regards to generic medicine. However, their knowledge score pertaining the technical and regulatory aspects of bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic parameters in particular was insufficient.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacistsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDrugs, GenericFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDrugs, GenericAttitudeCommunity pharmacistsGeneric medicinesKnowledgePalestinePractice

Identifiers

PMID29282055
PMCPMC5745619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.