Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282048›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

Exploring factors associated with the uneven utilization of telemedicine in Norway: a mixed methods study.

H Alami, M P Gagnon, R Wootton, J P Fortin, P Zanaboni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The 4P telehealth business framework for Iran.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H AlamiResearch Center on Healthcare and Services in Primary Care, Institute of Health and Social Services in Primary Care. Laval University (CERSSPL-UL). CIUSSS-CN, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, chemin de la canardiere, Quebec, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
M P GagnonResearch Center on Healthcare and Services in Primary Care, Institute of Health and Social Services in Primary Care. Laval University (CERSSPL-UL). CIUSSS-CN, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, chemin de la canardiere, Quebec, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
R WoottonNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 35, 9038, Tromso, Norway.
J P FortinResearch Center on Healthcare and Services in Primary Care, Institute of Health and Social Services in Primary Care. Laval University (CERSSPL-UL). CIUSSS-CN, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, chemin de la canardiere, Quebec, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
P ZanaboniNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 35, 9038, Tromso, Norway. paolo.zanaboni@ehealthresearch.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5469-092X
Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise · CAUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOCentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNorway has a long history of using telemedicine, especially for geographical reasons. Despite the availability of promising telemedicine applications and the implementation of national initiatives and policies, the sustainability and scaling-up of telemedicine in the health system is still far from accomplished. The main objective of this study was to explore and identify the multi-level (micro, meso and macro) factors affecting telemedicine utilization in Norway.

methodsWe used a mixed methods approach. Data from a national registry were collected to analyze the use of outpatient visits and telemedicine contacts in Norway from 2009 to 2015. Interviews with key stakeholders at national, regional and local level helped complete and contextualize the data analysis and explore the main issues affecting the use of telemedicine by health authorities and hospitals. Relevant national documents were also used to support, contradict, contextualize or clarify information and data.

resultsTelemedicine use in Norway from 2009 to 2015 remained very low, not exceeding 0.5% of total outpatient activity at regional level and 0.1% at national level. All four regions used telemedicine. Of the 29 hospitals, 24 used it at least once over the 7-year period. Telemedicine was not used regularly everywhere, with some hospitals using it sporadically. Telemedicine was mostly used in selected specialties, including rehabilitation, neurosurgery, skin and venereal diseases. Three major themes affecting implementation and utilization of telemedicine in Norway emerged: (i) governance and strategy; (ii) organizational and professional dimensions; (iii) economic and financial dimensions. For each theme, a number of factors and challenges faced at different health care levels were identified.

conclusionsThis study allowed shedding light on multi-level and interdependent factors affecting utilization of telemedicine in Norway. The identification of the main implementation and utilization challenges might support decision makers and practitioners in the successful scaling-up of telemedicine. This work provides a knowledge base useful to other countries which intend to implement telemedicine or other digital health services into their healthcare systems.

Indexed as

HospitalsHumansNorwayRegistriesTelemedicineAdoptionHealth systemImplementationScaling-upSustainabilityTelemedicineUtilization

Identifiers

PMID29282048
PMCPMC5745591
OpenAlexW2778428211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.