Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282035›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

Somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas: tumor capillaries as promising targets.

Daniel Kaemmerer, Robin Schindler, Franziska Mußbach, Uta Dahmen, Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann, Olaf Dirsch, Jörg Sänger, Stefan Schulz, Amelie Lupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Somatostatin and Somatostatin Receptors in Tumour Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel KaemmererDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Robin SchindlerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Drackendorfer Str. 1, D-07747, Jena, Germany.
Franziska MußbachDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Uta DahmenDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Annelore Altendorf-HofmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Olaf DirschInstitute of Pathology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jörg SängerInstitute of Pathology and Cytology Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Stefan SchulzInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Drackendorfer Str. 1, D-07747, Jena, Germany.
Amelie LuppInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Drackendorfer Str. 1, D-07747, Jena, Germany. Amelie.Lupp@med.uni-jena.de.
Jena University Hospital · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEZentralklinik Bad Berka · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular (HCC) and cholangiocellular carcinomas (CCC) display an exceptionally poor prognosis. Especially for advanced disease no efficient standard therapy is currently available. Recently, somatostatin analogs have been evaluated for the treatment of HCC, however, with contradictory results. Besides, for both malignancies the chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been discussed as a possible new target structure.

methodsExpression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes 1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5, and of CXCR4 was evaluated in a total of 71 HCCs and 27 CCCs by immunohistochemistry using well-characterized novel monoclonal antibodies.

resultsIn HCC tumor cells, frequency and intensity of expression of SSTRs and CXCR4 were only low. CXCR4 was present in about 40% of the HCCs, although at a low intensity. SSTR5, SSTR2, and SSTR3 were detected in about 15%, 8%, and 5% of the HCC tumors, respectively. SSTR and CXCR4 expression was much higher in CCC than in HCC. CXCR4 and SSTR1 were present in 60% and 67% of the CCC samples, respectively, followed by SSTR2 and SSTR5, which were detected in 30% and 11% of the tumors, respectively. Most notably, CXCR4 was intensely expressed on the tumor capillaries in about 50% of the HCCs and CCCs. CXCR4 expression on tumor vessels was associated with poor patient outcomes.

conclusionsCCC, but not HCC, may be suitable for SSTR-based treatments. Because of the predominant expression of SSTR1, pan-somatostatin analogs should be preferred. In both HCC and CCC, indirect targeting of tumors via the CXCR4-positive tumor capillaries may represent a promising additional therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCapillariesCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, CXCR4Biomarkers, TumorReceptors, CXCR4Receptors, SomatostatinChemokine receptorCholangiocellular carcinomaCXCR4Hepatocellular carcinomaSomatostatin receptors

Identifiers

PMID29282035
PMCPMC5745780
OpenAlexW2778191424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.