Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282030›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2017

Ratios for double silicone oil Endotamponade - in vitro observations may assist with ratio selection.

Cheryl MacGregor, Abigail Jonas, Abdul Hanifudin, Jonathan Lochhead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheryl MacGregorOphthalmology Department, St Mary's Hospital, Parkhurst Road, Newport, Isle of Wight, PO30 5TG, UK. macgregor.cheryl@doctors.org.uk.
Abigail JonasRoyal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Abdul HanifudinSouthampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Jonathan LochheadOphthalmology Department, St Mary's Hospital, Parkhurst Road, Newport, Isle of Wight, PO30 5TG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilicone oil tamponade is more frequently reserved for cases of complex retinal detachment. We describe the effects of different variations in oil ratios with the relatively unknown technique of double oil tamponade.

methodsRetrospective case note review of nine patients with complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD). All cases had both superior and inferior breaks, mostly with associated proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). All cases were treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and a double silicone oil endotamponade (DSOE) of both heavy silicone oil and conventional 'light' silicone oil. Ratios were varied to suit different RD configurations. In vitro observations were studied to help direct these decisions.

resultsAnatomical success was achieved in all cases. Common complications were the same as those seen in single oil tamponade (elevated intraocular pressure, cystoid macular oedema (CMO), cataract and posterior capsule opacification. No single case of recurrent RD was seen whilst mixed oil remained in situ.

conclusionsDouble silicone oil endotamponade is a safe and effective treatment for complex retinal detachments with superior and inferior breaks. Differences in oil ratios can be tailored to best fit the distribution of retinal pathology. In vitro observations may help to inform these choices.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overEndotamponadeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRetinal DetachmentRetrospective StudiesSilicone OilsTreatment OutcomeVitrectomydensironSilicone OilsComplex retinal detachmentDouble silicone oil endotamponadeRetinal detachmentSilicone oil

Identifiers

PMID29282030
PMCPMC5745889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.