Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281986›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2017

Preschool children in out-of-hours primary care - a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of factors related to the medical relevance of health problems.

Grete Moth, Linda Huibers, Astrid Ovesen, Morten Bondo Christensen, Peter Vedsted

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grete MothResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. moth@ph.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-6054-7444
Linda HuibersResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Astrid OvesenResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten Bondo ChristensenResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter VedstedResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) is intended to provide medical care services for health problems that cannot wait until normal office hours. Children under five years of age represent about 19% of all OOH-PC contacts in Denmark, and the frequency of calls assessed as severe by health professionals is markedly lower for children than for other age groups. Several studies have questioned the appropriateness of the parents' use of OOH-PC. We aimed to identify factors associated with calls from parents of pre-school children concerning perceived non-severe health problems that were ranked by the triaging GPs as more appropriate for GP office hours (defined as 'medically irrelevant').

methodsWe used data from a cross-sectional study performed in the Central Denmark Region for a 1-year period during 2010-2011. GPs in the OOH-PC assessed random contacts, and a questionnaire was subsequently sent to registered patients. Associations between different factors and the medical irrelevance of contacts were estimated with a generalised linear model to calculate the prevalence ratio (PR).

resultsAmong all included 522 telephone consultations and 1226 face-to-face consultations, we identified 71 (13.6%) telephone consultations and 95 (7.8%) face-to-face consultations that were both assessed as non-severe by the parents and more appropriate for GP office hours by the GPs. For telephone consultations, contacts at other times than 4-8 pm on weekdays were statistically significantly associated with medical irrelevance. Additionally, symptoms of longer duration than 24 h were statistically significantly associated medical irrelevance.

conclusionsA large part of the calls to the Danish OOH-PC concern children. The results indicate that some of these calls are made for other than strictly medical reasons. To achieve more effective use of available resources, it might seem relevant to aim at directing more contacts directly to daytime care. However, future studies to enhance our knowledge on parents' motivation and behaviour would be recommendable.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkGeneral PracticeHealth Services MisuseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOffice VisitsParentsPatient AcuityPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephoneAppropriatenessDenmarkGeneral practiceOut-of-hoursReason for encounterSeverity

Identifiers

PMID29281986
PMCPMC5746005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.