Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281960›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2017

An analytical framework to derive the expected precision of genomic selection.

Jean-Michel Elsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jean-Michel ElsenGenPhySE (Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France. jean-michel.elsen@inra.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-8275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFormulae to predict the precision or accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) are important when modelling selection schemes. Simple versions of such formulae have been proposed in the past, based on a number of simplifying hypotheses, including absence of linkage disequilibrium and linkage between loci, a population made up of unrelated individuals, and that all genetic variability of the trait is explained by the genotyped loci. These formulae were based on approximations that were not always clear. The objective of this paper is to offer a unique framework to derive equations that predict the precision of GEBV from the size of the reference population and the heritability of and number of QTL controlling the quantitative trait.

resultsThe exact formulation of the precision of GEBV involves the expectation of the inverse of a linear function of the genomic matrix, which cannot be calculated from simple algebra but can be approximated using a Taylor polynomial expansion. First order approximations performed better than the initial prediction equations published in the literature. Second order approximations produced almost perfect estimates of precision when compared to results obtained when simulating situations that agreed with the assumptions that were required to derive the precision equations. Using this proposed framework, we present several generalizations, including multi-trait genomic evaluation.

conclusionsAlthough further improvements are needed to account for the complexity of practical situations, the equations proposed here can be used to derive the precision of GEBV when comparing breeding schemes a priori.

Indexed as

BreedingGene FrequencySelection, GeneticAnimalsGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID29281960
PMCPMC5745666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.