Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281893›Full record

Observational studyJournal of diabetes science and technology2018

Adherence Over Time: The Course of Adherence to Customized Diabetic Insoles as Objectively Assessed by a Temperature Sensor.

Dominic Ehrmann, Monika Spengler, Michael Jahn, Dea Niebuhr, Thomas Haak, Bernhard Kulzer, Norbert Hermanns

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dominic Ehrmann1 Research Institute of the Diabetes Academy Mergentheim (FIDAM), Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Monika Spengler3 IETEC Foot Orthotics GmbH, Künzell, Germany.
Michael Jahn3 IETEC Foot Orthotics GmbH, Künzell, Germany.
Dea Niebuhr4 Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany.
Thomas Haak5 Diabetes Clinic Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Bernhard Kulzer1 Research Institute of the Diabetes Academy Mergentheim (FIDAM), Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Norbert Hermanns1 Research Institute of the Diabetes Academy Mergentheim (FIDAM), Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
University of Bamberg · DEForschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim · DEFulda University of Applied Sciences · DEGerman Diabetes Center Mergentheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTemperature sensors are an objective way to assess adherence to diabetic footwear. Good adherence is essential for the prevention of diabetic foot problems. Little is known about the long-term course of adherence in patients at risk for diabetic foot problems.

methodA temperature sensor was incorporated into the specialized footwear of patients with type 2 diabetes after their first plantar ulceration. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze when patients started to become nonadherent (not wearing the footwear for two straight weeks). Gender effects on adherence were also analyzed.

results26 patients with a mean observation time of 133.5 days could be analyzed. Mean wearing time of diabetic footwear was 4.2 ± 3.6 h/day (Mdn = 3.4 h/day; interquartile range = 0.5-7.0 h/day) and on 51% of the days patients did not wear their footwear at all. Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that the mean time of adherence was 27.5 weeks. Men achieved a mean time of adherence of 30.5 weeks, while women only achieved 14 weeks. However, due to the small sample size, this difference was not statistically significant.

conclusionsTemperature sensors revealed a low long-term adherence to diabetic footwear. Women seemed to be at a higher risk for earlier nonadherent behavior. Adherence to diabetic footwear should be closely monitored and tailored intervention strategies should be developed.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesThermometersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic FootFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceTemperatureadherencediabetic foot problemsgender effectstemperature sensor

Identifiers

PMID29281893
PMCPMC6154238
OpenAlexW2777087484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.