Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281873›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2018

Safety Results and Analysis of Eribulin Efficacy according to Previous Microtubules-Inhibitors Sensitivity in the French Prospective Expanded Access Program for Heavily Pre-treated Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Renaud Sabatier, Véronique Diéras, Xavier Pivot, Etienne Brain, Henri Roché, Jean-Marc Extra, Audrey Monneur, Magali Provansal, Carole Tarpin, François Bertucci and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging treatment approaches for triple-negative breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Renaud SabatierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Véronique DiérasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Xavier PivotUniversity Hospital Jean Minjoz, INSERM, Besançon, France.
Etienne BrainInstitut Curie-Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France.
Henri RochéInstitut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-oncopole, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Marc ExtraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Audrey MonneurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Magali ProvansalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Carole TarpinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
François BertucciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Patrice ViensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Christophe ZemmourDepartment of Clinical Research and Innovation, Biostatistics Unit, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Anthony GonçalvesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Institut Paoli-Calmettes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRInstitut Curie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEribulin is approved for advanced breast cancers refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes. Efficacy according to sensitivity to previous therapies has been poorly explored. MATERIALS AND

methodsSafety data were collected prospectively and we retrospectively collected efficacy data from the five French centres that participated in the Eribulin E7389-G000-398 expanded access program. Our main objectiveswere exploration of safety and analysis of eribulin efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) according to sensitivity to the last microtubule-inhibiting agent administered.

resultsMedian eribulin treatment duration was 3.3 months for the 250 patients included in this prospective single-arm study. Two hundreds and thirty-nine patients (95.6%) experienced an adverse event (AE) related to treatment including 129 (51.6%) with grade ≥ 3 AEs. The most frequently observed toxicities were cytopenias (59.6% of included patients), gastrointestinal disorders (59.2%), and asthenia (56.4%). The most frequent grade 3-4 AE was neutropenia (37.2% with 4.8% febrile neutropenia). Median PFS and OS were 4.6 and 11.8 months, respectively. Patients classified as responders to the last microtubule-inhibiting therapy had a longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.94; p=0.017), and tended to display a better PFS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.04; p=0.086). OS improvement was still significant in multivariate analysis (adjusted HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.79; p=0.002).

conclusionThis work based on a prospective study suggests that identification of patients likely to be more sensitive to eribulin could be based on their previous response to microtubules inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFranceFuransHumansKetonesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPolyether PolyketidesProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeeribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesTubulin ModulatorsEribulinMetastatic breast cancerMicrotubule inhibitionSafetySurvival

Identifiers

PMID29281873
PMCPMC6192912
OpenAlexW2779086608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.