Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281857›Full record

Observational studyBJU international2018

Outcomes of subsequent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Makito Miyake, Yoshihiro Tatsumi, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Nagao, Hideyasu Matsuyama, Teruo Inamoto, Haruhito Azuma, Hiroaki Yasumoto, Hiroaki Shiina, Kiyohide Fujimoto and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in BJU international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yoshihiro TatsumiDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Hiroaki MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Kazuhiro NagaoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Hideyasu MatsuyamaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Teruo InamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Haruhito AzumaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki YasumotoDepartment of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Hiroaki ShiinaDepartment of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Nishinihon Uro-Oncology Collaborative Group
Nara Medical University · JPYamaguchi University · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPShimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of subsequent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and particularly its response to intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). PATIENTS AND

methodsAn observational study was conducted in 1463 patients with UTUC who had undergone RNU and in 1555 patients with primary NMIBC. Of the 1463 patients with UTUC, 256 (17%) subsequently developed NMIBC (UTUC-NMIBC group) and were available for the analysis. The clinicopathological background and outcomes, including intravesical recurrence-free survival and bladder progression-free survival, were compared between the patients with UTUC-NMIBC and the patients with primary NMIBC treated with intravesical BCG. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the potential differences in the backgrounds of the two groups. To validate the utility of the CUETO scoring model in the UTUC-NMIBC group, risk scores were calculated and compared with the published probabilities for recurrence and progression.

resultsCompared with the unadjusted primary NMIBC group (n = 352), the UTUC-NMIBC group (n = 75) were found to have a worse prognosis for intravesical recurrence and progression, before propensity score matching. After propensity score matching for potential confounding factors, however, a worse prognosis was observed only for intravesical recurrence. The validation test of the CUETO scoring model for the UTUC-NMIBC group showed a significant difference in the rate of intravesical recurrence and progression for the 0-4 and 5-6 score groups between the UTUC-NMIBC group and the CUETO risk table reference data.

conclusionCompared with the primary NMIBC group, the UTUC-NMIBC group had a worse prognosis after intravesical BCG, especially with regard to intravesical recurrence. This suggests that patients with UTUC-NMIBC are inherently poor responders to BCG exposure. An optimal treatment strategy and risk scoring model to select patients for adjuvant intravesical BCG, chemotherapy or immediate radical cystectomy should be established.

Indexed as

NephroureterectomyAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalAgedBCG VaccineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineBacillus Calmette-Guérin#BladderCancer#blcsmintravesical recurrenceprogressionpropensity scoreupper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma#utuc

Identifiers

PMID29281857
OpenAlexW2778369077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.