Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281708›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Protein-protein conjugate nanoparticles for malaria antigen delivery and enhanced immunogenicity.

Puthupparampil V Scaria, Beth Chen, Christopher G Rowe, David S Jones, Emma Barnafo, Elizabeth R Fischer, Charles Anderson, Nicholas J MacDonald, Lynn Lambert, Kelly M Rausch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Virtues and Vices of Pfs230: From Vaccine Concept to Vaccine Candidate.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A chitosan-based nanosystem as pneumococcal vaccine delivery platform.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Puthupparampil V ScariaLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Beth ChenLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Christopher G RoweLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
David S JonesLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Emma BarnafoLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Elizabeth R FischerEM Unit/RTB Rocky Mountain Laboratories/NIAID/NIH, Hamilton, MT, United States of America.
Charles AndersonLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Nicholas J MacDonaldLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Lynn LambertLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Kelly M RauschLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
David L NarumLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Patrick E DuffyLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4483-5005
National Institutes of Health · USRocky Mountain Research (United States) · US

Funding

Infectious Diseases Research Technologies Core - RMLZICAI001052 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CHERRY, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$133.3M
Vaccines to Interrupt Malaria Transmission: Clinical DevelopmentZIAAI001009 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI DUFFY, PATRICK · 2009 to 2025
$84.8M
Optimizing malaria transmission-blocking vaccines with improved platforms ZIAAI001008 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI DUFFY, PATRICK · 2009 to 2024
$25.2M
Malaria Vaccines: Pvs230D1-EPA and PvCSPZIAAI001224 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI DUFFY, PATRICK · 2017 to 2024
$596k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical conjugation of polysaccharide to carrier proteins has been a successful strategy to generate potent vaccines against bacterial pathogens. We developed a similar approach for poorly immunogenic malaria protein antigens. Our lead candidates in clinical trials are the malaria transmission blocking vaccine antigens, Pfs25 and Pfs230D1, individually conjugated to the carrier protein Exoprotein A (EPA) through thioether chemistry. These conjugates form nanoparticles that show enhanced immunogenicity compared to unconjugated antigens. In this study, we examined the broad applicability of this technology as a vaccine development platform, by comparing the immunogenicity of conjugates prepared by four different chemistries using different malaria antigens (PfCSP, Pfs25 and Pfs230D1), and carriers such as EPA, TT and CRM197. Several conjugates were synthesized using thioether, amide, ADH and glutaraldehyde chemistries, characterized for average molecular weight and molecular weight distribution, and evaluated in mice for humoral immunogenicity. Conjugates made with the different chemistries, or with different carriers, showed no significant difference in immunogenicity towards the conjugated antigens. Since particle size can influence immunogenicity, we tested conjugates with different average size in the range of 16-73 nm diameter, and observed greater immunogenicity of smaller particles, with significant differences between 16 and 73 nm particles. These results demonstrate the multiple options with respect to carriers and chemistries that are available for protein-protein conjugate vaccine development.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanMiceParticle SizeProteinsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanProteins

Identifiers

PMID29281708
PMCPMC5744994
OpenAlexW2778723308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.