Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281693›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Expression of naturally ionic liquid-tolerant thermophilic cellulases in Aspergillus niger.

Saori Amaike Campen, Jed Lynn, Stephanie J Sibert, Sneha Srikrishnan, Pallavi Phatale, Taya Feldman, Joel M Guenther, Jennifer Hiras, Yvette Thuy An Tran, Steven W Singer and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saori Amaike CampenJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7218-1301
Jed LynnJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Stephanie J SibertJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Sneha SrikrishnanJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Pallavi PhataleJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Taya FeldmanJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Joel M GuentherJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Jennifer HirasJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Yvette Thuy An TranJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Steven W SingerJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Paul D AdamsJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Kenneth L SaleJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Blake A SimmonsJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Scott E BakerJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Jon K MagnusonJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
John M GladdenJoint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, United States of America.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient deconstruction of plant biomass is a major barrier to the development of viable lignocellulosic biofuels. Pretreatment with ionic liquids reduces lignocellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing yields of sugars for conversion into biofuels. However, commercial cellulases are not compatible with many ionic liquids, necessitating extensive water washing of pretreated biomass prior to hydrolysis. To circumvent this issue, previous research has demonstrated that several thermophilic bacterial cellulases can efficiently deconstruct lignocellulose in the presence of the ionic liquid, 1-ethyl-3-methylimadizolium acetate. As promising as these enzymes are, they would need to be produced at high titer in an industrial enzyme production host before they could be considered a viable alternative to current commercial cellulases. Aspergillus niger has been used to produce high titers of secreted enzymes in industry and therefore, we assessed the potential of this organism to be used as an expression host for these ionic liquid-tolerant cellulases. We demonstrated that 29 of these cellulases were expressed at detectable levels in a wild-type strain of A. niger, indicating a basic level of compatibility and potential to be produced at high levels in a host engineered to produce high titers of enzymes. We then profiled one of these enzymes in detail, the β-glucosidase A5IL97, and compared versions expressed in both A. niger and Escherichia coli. This comparison revealed the enzymatic activity of A5IL97 purified from E. coli and A. niger is equivalent, suggesting that A. niger could be an excellent enzyme production host for enzymes originally characterized in E. coli, facilitating the transition from the laboratory to industry.

Indexed as

Aspergillus nigerBiomassCellulasesEscherichia coliFermentationHydrolysisIonic LiquidsRecombinant ProteinsCellulasesIonic LiquidsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29281693
PMCPMC5744941
OpenAlexW2778517784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.