Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281680›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing.

Sharjeel H Sabir, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Sanjay Gupta, Gordon B Mills, Wei Wei, Andrea C Cortes, Kenna R Mills Shaw, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Michael J Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sharjeel H SabirDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-9614
Savitri KrishnamurthyDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Sanjay GuptaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Gordon B MillsDepartment of System Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Wei WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Andrea C CortesDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Kenna R Mills ShawSheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Rajyalakshmi LuthraDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Michael J WallaceDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetermine the characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies that are adequate for a next generation sequencing (NGS) genomic panel. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients undergoing percutaneous core biopsies in interventional radiology (IR) with samples evaluated for a 46-gene NGS panel during 1-year were included in this retrospective study. Patient and procedure variables were collected. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score incorporating targeting and sampling factors was assigned to each biopsied lesion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed.

results153 patients were included (58.2% female, average age 59.5 years). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (40.5%), most common biopsied site was lung (36%), and average size of biopsied lesions was 3.8 cm (+/- 2.7). Adequacy for NGS was 69.9%. Univariate analysis showed higher likelihood of adequacy score (p = 0.004), primary malignancy type (p = 0.03), and absence of prior systemic therapy (p = 0.018) were associated with adequacy for NGS. Multivariate analysis showed higher adequacy for lesions with likelihood of adequacy scored 3 (high) versus lesions scored 1 (low) (OR, 7.82; p = 0.002). Melanoma lesions had higher adequacy for NGS versus breast cancer lesions (OR 9.5; p = 0.01). Absence of prior systemic therapy (OR, 6.1; p = 0.02) and systemic therapy </ = 3 months (OR 3.24; p = 0.01) compared to systemic therapy >3 months before biopsy yielded greater adequacy for NGS. Lesions <3 cm had greater adequacy for NGS than larger lesions (OR 2.72, p = 0.02).

conclusionAs targeted therapy becomes standard for more cancers, percutaneous biopsy specimens adequate for NGS genomic testing will be needed. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score assigned by IR physicians and other pre-procedure variables can help predict the likelihood of biopsy adequacy for NGS.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Large-Core NeedleFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal Imaging

Identifiers

PMID29281680
PMCPMC5744968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.