ArticlePloS one2017
Rates, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries: A comparison of tribal and non-tribal women in Gujarat, India.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preference of mode of delivery and associated factors among mothers in East Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for cesarean delivery: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Rising Cesarean Section Rates in Pakistan: Analyzing Frequency and Key Risk Factors in a Tertiary-Care Hospital.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Length of stay and determinants of early discharge and extended stay after cesarean delivery in a resource-limited setting: southern Ethiopia, 2023.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Article
- Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Variations in the prevalence of caesarean section deliveries in India between 2016 and 2021 - an analysis of Tamil Nadu and Chhattisgarh.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Factors Contributing to Rapidly Increasing Rates of Caesarean Section in Andhra Pradesh, India: A Case-Control Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Predictors of surgical site infection among women following cesarean delivery in eastern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Factors Associated with High Rates of Caesarean Deliveries: A Cross Sectional Study Classifying Deliveries According to Robson in Mengo Hospital Kampala.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Identification of Contractions from Electrohysterography for Prediction of Prolonged Labor.Journal of electrical bioimpedance · 2022Article
- Cesarean section or normal vaginal delivery: A cross-sectional study of attitude of medical students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Geographical variability and factors associated with caesarean section delivery in India: a comparative assessment of Bihar and Tamil Nadu.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Camylofin in Augmentation of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2020Review
- Article
- Examining tribal health inequalities around three forested sites in India: Results of a cross-sectional survey.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Patient safety in surgery · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven though the caesarean section is an essential component of comprehensive obstetric and newborn care for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, there is a lack of data regarding caesarean section rates, its determinants and health outcomes among tribal communities in India.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to estimate and compare rates, determinants, indications and outcomes of caesarean section. The article provides an assessment on how the inequitable utilization can be addressed in a community-based hospital in tribal areas of Gujarat, India.
methodProspectively collected data of deliveries (N = 19923) from April 2010 to March 2016 in Kasturba Maternity Hospital was used. The odds ratio of caesarean section was estimated for tribal and non-tribal women. Decomposition analysis was done to decompose the differences in the caesarean section rates between tribal and non-tribal women.
resultsThe caesarean section rate was significantly lower among tribal compared to the non-tribal women (9.4% vs 15.6%, p-value < 0.01) respectively. The 60% of the differences in the rates of caesarean section between tribal and non-tribal women were unexplained. Within the explained variation, the previous caesarean accounted for 96% (p-value < 0.01) of the variation. Age of the mother, parity, previous caesarean and distance from the hospital were some of the important determinants of caesarean section rates. The most common indications of caesarean section were foetal distress (31.2%), previous caesarean section (23.9%), breech (16%) and prolonged labour (11.2%). There was no difference in case fatality rate (1.3% vs 1.4%, p-value = 0.90) and incidence of birth asphyxia (0.3% vs 0.6%, p-value = 0.26) comparing the tribal and non-tribal women.
conclusionSimilar to the prior evidences, we found higher caesarean rates among non-tribal compare to tribal women. However, the adverse outcomes were similar between tribal and non-tribal women for caesarean section deliveries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.