ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2017
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 113 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinically Indicated Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (PPM) and Implantable Defibrillators (ICD)
Safety of Clinically Indicated Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (PPM) and Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators
An Expanded Evaluation of the Safety of Clinically Indicated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Patients With Pacemakers and Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety in Patients With Non-Conditional, Mixed-Manufacturer Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
Who cites it
113 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 287 citations in OpenAlex.
- SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Guideline
- Cardiac structural changes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020Pooled it
- In Vitro Assessment of 3T MRI Effects on Non-3T-Compatible Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Perioperative management of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a state of the art narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- [MRI safety : Principles, risks and protective measures].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Bridging anatomy and function in ischemic VT: CT wall-thickness and coherent mapping insights.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- MRI and Implant Safety at Low-Field and Ultralow-Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Applicability of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Devices: A Systematic Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Cardiac sarcoidosis: The role of steroid therapy in managing myocardial inflammation and arrhythmic risks.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular imaging in children with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Automated fibrosis segmentation from wideband post-contrastMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Highlights of the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2024 Conference: the first joint European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance conference.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025Article
- Results of a national survey among occupational physicians to estimate the number of workers with active medical devices and their types in the context of managing electromagnetic hazards.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Diagnosing acute myocarditis in the emergency department-advancing cardiac MRI with a focus on low-field MR applications.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- Highlights of the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2024 Conference: the first joint European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance conference.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- Myocardial blood flow quantification in patients with an implanted cardiodefibrillator during stress and at rest using a wideband perfusion pulse sequence: an initial feasibility study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices: an Italian perspective on the prevalence of mixed-brand systems over time.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: the RESONANCE Spanish registry.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients who have pacemakers or defibrillators are often denied the opportunity to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of safety concerns, unless the devices meet certain criteria specified by the Food and Drug Administration (termed "MRI-conditional" devices).
methodsWe performed a prospective, nonrandomized study to assess the safety of MRI at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 Tesla in 1509 patients who had a pacemaker (58%) or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (42%) that was not considered to be MRI-conditional (termed a "legacy" device). Overall, the patients underwent 2103 thoracic and nonthoracic MRI examinations that were deemed to be clinically necessary. The pacing mode was changed to asynchronous mode for pacing-dependent patients and to demand mode for other patients. Tachyarrhythmia functions were disabled. Outcome assessments included adverse events and changes in the variables that indicate lead and generator function and interaction with surrounding tissue (device parameters).
resultsNo long-term clinically significant adverse events were reported. In nine MRI examinations (0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.7), the patient's device reset to a backup mode. The reset was transient in eight of the nine examinations. In one case, a pacemaker with less than 1 month left of battery life reset to ventricular inhibited pacing and could not be reprogrammed; the device was subsequently replaced. The most common notable change in device parameters (>50% change from baseline) immediately after MRI was a decrease in P-wave amplitude, which occurred in 1% of the patients. At long-term follow-up (results of which were available for 63% of the patients), the most common notable changes from baseline were decreases in P-wave amplitude (in 4% of the patients), increases in atrial capture threshold (4%), increases in right ventricular capture threshold (4%), and increases in left ventricular capture threshold (3%). The observed changes in lead parameters were not clinically significant and did not require device revision or reprogramming.
conclusionsWe evaluated the safety of MRI, performed with the use of a prespecified safety protocol, in 1509 patients who had a legacy pacemaker or a legacy implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system. No long-term clinically significant adverse events were reported. (Funded by Johns Hopkins University and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01130896 .).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.