Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29280510›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2018

The challenges of promoting osteogenesis in segmental bone defects and osteoporosis.

Alyssa N Ball, Seth W Donahue, Samantha J Wojda, C Wayne McIlwraith, Christopher E Kawcak, Nicole Ehrhart, Laurie R Goodrich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Osteoimmunomodulatory Nanoparticles for Bone Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alyssa N BallOrthopaedic Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, 1678 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1678.
Seth W DonahueOrthopaedic Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, 1678 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1678.
Samantha J WojdaOrthopaedic Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, 1678 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1678.
C Wayne McIlwraithOrthopaedic Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, 1678 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1678.
Christopher E KawcakOrthopaedic Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, 1678 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1678.
Nicole EhrhartDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Flint Animal Cancer Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Laurie R GoodrichOrthopaedic Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, 1678 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1678.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

Veterinary Pre-Doctoral Research Scholars ProgramT32OD012201 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VANDEWOUDE, SUE · 2013 to 2019
$795k
NIH HHS T32 OD012201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional clinical management of complex bone healing scenarios continues to result in 5-10% of fractures forming non-unions. Additionally, the aging population and prevalence of osteoporosis-related fractures necessitate the further exploration of novel ways to augment osteogenesis in this special population. This review focuses on the current clinical modalities available, and the ongoing clinical and pre-clinical research to promote osteogenesis in segmental bone defects, delayed unions, and osteoporosis. In summary, animal models of fracture repair are often small animals as historically significant large animal models, like the dog, continue to gain favor as companion animals. Small rodents have well-documented limitations in comparing to fracture repair in humans, and few similarities exist. Study design, number of studies, and availability of funding continue to limit large animal studies. Osteoinduction with rhBMP-2 results in robust bone formation, although long-term quality is scrutinized due to poor bone mineral quality. PTH 1-34 is the only FDA approved osteo-anabolic treatment to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Limited to 2 years of clinical use, PTH 1-34 has further been plagued by dose-related ambiguities and inconsistent results when applied to pathologic fractures in systematic human clinical studies. There is limited animal data of PTH 1-34 applied locally to bone defects. Gene therapy continues to gain popularity among researchers to augment bone healing. Non-integrating viral vectors and targeted apoptosis of genetically modified therapeutic cells is an ongoing area of research. Finally, progenitor cell therapies and the content variation of patient-side treatments (e.g., PRP and BMAC) are being studied. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1559-1572, 2018.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Disease Models, AnimalFracture HealingFractures, BoneGenetic TherapyHumansOsteogenesisOsteoporotic FracturesParathyroid HormoneStem Cell TransplantationBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Parathyroid Hormonefracture repairgene therapynon-union

Identifiers

PMID29280510
PMCPMC8354209
OpenAlexW2779054046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.