Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29280348›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2018

Bacillus subtilis, the model Gram-positive bacterium: 20 years of annotation refinement.

Rainer Borriss, Antoine Danchin, Colin R Harwood, Claudine Médigue, Eduardo P C Rocha, Agnieszka Sekowska, David Vallenet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Unlocking the Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Essential oils and their blends: mechanism of antibacterial activity and antibiofilm potential on food-grade maize starch packaging films.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A historical sequence deletion in a commonly usedMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  15. Control of asparagine homeostasis inJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  16. A historical sequence deletion in a commonly usedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rainer BorrissDepartment of Phytomedicine, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Lentzeallee 55-57, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Antoine DanchinHôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Colin R HarwoodThe Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Claudine MédigueCEA DRF Genoscope LABGeM, CNRS, UMR8030 Génomique Métabolique, Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91057, Evry, France.
Eduardo P C RochaMicrobial Evolutionary Genomics Unit, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France.
Agnieszka SekowskaHôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
David VallenetCEA DRF Genoscope LABGeM, CNRS, UMR8030 Génomique Métabolique, Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91057, Evry, France.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/13799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome annotation is, nowadays, performed via automatic pipelines that cannot discriminate between right and wrong annotations. Given their importance in increasing the accuracy of the genome annotations of other organisms, it is critical that the annotations of model organisms reflect the current annotation gold standard. The genome of Bacillus subtilis strain 168 was sequenced twenty years ago. Using a combination of inductive, deductive and abductive reasoning, we present a unique, manually curated annotation, essentially based on experimental data. This reveals how this bacterium lives in a plant niche, while carrying a paleome operating system common to Firmicutes and Tenericutes. Dozens of new genomic objects and an extensive literature survey have been included for the sequence available at the INSDC (AccNum AL009126.3). We also propose an extension to Demerec's nomenclature rules that will help investigators connect to this type of curated annotation via the use of common gene names.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialMolecular Sequence AnnotationBacillus subtilisComputational BiologyTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29280348
PMCPMC5743806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.