Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29280092›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018

Classifying clinical notes with pain assessment using machine learning.

Samah Jamal Fodeh, Dezon Finch, Lina Bouayad, Stephen L Luther, Han Ling, Robert D Kerns, Cynthia Brandt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samah Jamal FodehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale Center of Medical Informatics, Suite 264F, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519-1315, USA. samah.fodeh@yale.edu.
Dezon FinchCenter of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, and the University of South Florida College of Public Health, 8900 Grand Oak Circle, Tampa, FL, 33637, USA.
Lina BouayadCenter of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, and the University of South Florida College of Public Health, 8900 Grand Oak Circle, Tampa, FL, 33637, USA.
Stephen L LutherCenter of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, and the University of South Florida College of Public Health, 8900 Grand Oak Circle, Tampa, FL, 33637, USA.
Han LingInternal Medicine (Geriatrics), Yale University, 300 George St, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Robert D KernsDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA.
Cynthia BrandtPain Research, Informatics, Medical comorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA.
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital · USYale University · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Pain Care Quality and Integrated and Complementary Health ApproachesR01AT008448 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BRANDT, CYNTHIA A., KERNS, ROBERT D · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
National Institutes of Health 1R01AT008448-01NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a significant public health problem, affecting millions of people in the USA. Evidence has highlighted that patients with chronic pain often suffer from deficits in pain care quality (PCQ) including pain assessment, treatment, and reassessment. Currently, there is no intelligent and reliable approach to identify PCQ indicators inelectronic health records (EHR). Hereby, we used unstructured text narratives in the EHR to derive pain assessment in clinical notes for patients with chronic pain. Our dataset includes patients with documented pain intensity rating ratings > = 4 and initial musculoskeletal diagnoses (MSD) captured by (ICD-9-CM codes) in fiscal year 2011 and a minimal 1 year of follow-up (follow-up period is 3-yr maximum); with complete data on key demographic variables. A total of 92 patients with 1058 notes was used. First, we manually annotated qualifiers and descriptors of pain assessment using the annotation schema that we previously developed. Second, we developed a reliable classifier for indicators of pain assessment in clinical note. Based on our annotation schema, we found variations in documenting the subclasses of pain assessment. In positive notes, providers mostly documented assessment of pain site (67%) and intensity of pain (57%), followed by persistence (32%). In only 27% of positive notes, did providers document a presumed etiology for the pain complaint or diagnosis. Documentation of patients' reports of factors that aggravate pain was only present in 11% of positive notes. Random forest classifier achieved the best performance labeling clinical notes with pain assessment information, compared to other classifiers; 94, 95, 94, and 94% was observed in terms of accuracy, PPV, F1-score, and AUC, respectively. Despite the wide spectrum of research that utilizes machine learning in many clinical applications, none explored using these methods for pain assessment research. In addition, previous studies using large datasets to detect and analyze characteristics of patients with various types of pain have relied exclusively on billing and coded data as the main source of information. This study, in contrast, harnessed unstructured narrative text data from the EHR to detect pain assessment clinical notes. We developed a Random forest classifier to identify clinical notes with pain assessment information. Compared to other classifiers, ours achieved the best results in most of the reported metrics. Graphical abstract Framework for detecting pain assessment in clinical notes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPain MeasurementAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAssessmentClassificationPainRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID29280092
PMCPMC6014866
OpenAlexW2778867749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.