Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29280038›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2018

Physicians' Awareness and Utilization of Genetic Services in Texas.

Callie Diamonstein, Blair Stevens, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Jerrie Refuerzo, Cathy Sullivan, Jennifer Hoskovec

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic medicine in neonatal care: progress and challenges.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Role of genomic medicine and implementing equitable access for critically ill infants in neonatal intensive care units.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Callie DiamonsteinDivision of Medical Genomics, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA. Callie.Diamonstein@inova.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-7437
Blair StevensDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA.
S Shahrukh HashmiDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA.
Jerrie RefuerzoGenetic Counseling Program, University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.
Cathy SullivanLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jennifer HoskovecGenetic Counseling Program, University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of disorders for which genetic testing is available has increased nearly 500% in the past 15 years. Access to genetic tests and services often hinges on physicians' ability to identify patients at risk for genetic disease and provide appropriate testing and counseling or refer to genetic specialists. Recent research demonstrates the need for referrals to genetic specialists by showing that many physicians lack skills required to perform appropriate genetic services, such as making proper risk assessments, providing genetic counseling, ordering genetic testing and interpreting results. However, little research exists on physicians' awareness and utilization of genetic services. In this study, an electronic survey evaluating practicing physicians' awareness of, utilization of and perceived barriers to genetic services in Texas, and interest in learning more about genetics and genetic services was distributed via state physician organizations. Of the 157 participants, approximately half reported they were moderately or very aware of genetic testing and services in their area. Very few reported awareness of telemedicine services. Over two-thirds reported never or rarely referring to genetic counselors or other genetic specialists, despite 75% reporting they had noticed an increased impact of genetics on their field and 61% reporting they had discussed genetics more in their day-to-day practice in the last 5-10 years. Only 20% reported genetics was very integral to their specialty. Over three-fourths of all participants indicated interest in learning more about genetics, genetic testing, and genetic services. Among the most frequently chosen barriers to genetic counselors were awareness-related barriers such as not knowing how to refer to a genetic counselor. Responses to many items varied significantly by medical specialty. The results identify a need to increase awareness of genetic services and referral logistics. Specific findings can help direct outreach efforts to educate clinicians, such as developing clinically meaningful, specialty-specific educational objectives.

Indexed as

AwarenessGenetic TestingPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansReferral and ConsultationRisk AssessmentSocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTexasAwareness of genetic servicesGenetic counselingGenetic educationGenetic servicesGenetic testing accessUtilization of genetic services

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.