Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29279961›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Assessment of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy detected on commercial panel using MPS system with artificial mixture samples.

Sohee Cho, Moon Young Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Soong Deok Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sohee ChoInstitute of Forensic Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Moon Young KimDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Ji Hyun LeeDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Soong Deok LeeInstitute of Forensic Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. sdlee@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) heteroplasmy is a potential genetic marker for forensic mtDNA analysis as well as phylogenic studies. Frequency of mtDNA heteroplasmy has been investigated in different populations through massively parallel sequencing (MPS) analysis, revealing various levels of frequency based on different MPS systems. For accurate heteroplasmy identification, it is essential to explore reliable detection threshold on various MPS systems. In addition, software solutions and pipelines need to be evaluated to analyze data effectively. In this study, heteroplasmy analysis was conducted on a commercially available mtDNA analysis system developed for forensic caseworks with artificially mixed DNA samples known for ratios and variant positions for assessment. mtDNA heteroplasmy > 10% was detectable with Torrent Variant Caller (TVC) while lower levels were identified using GeneMarker® HTS specialized software for minor variant detection. This study implies that analytical parameters and tools need to be optimized and evaluated for low-level heteroplasmy identification. Automated system with simple and efficient workflow is needed for forensic caseworks.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSoftwareDNA, MitochondrialLow-level heteroplasmyMassively parallel sequencingMitochondrial DNAMixture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.