Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29279935›Full record

ArticleJAMA2017

Association of Modifiable Risk Factors in Young Adulthood With Racial Disparity in Incident Type 2 Diabetes During Middle Adulthood.

Michael P Bancks, Kiarri Kershaw, April P Carson, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Pamela J Schreiner, Mercedes R Carnethon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06160037 (Influence of Prenatal and Early Childhood Home-Visiting by Nurses on Development of Chronic Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06160037 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Influence of Prenatal and Early Childhood Home-Visiting by Nurses on Development of Chronic Disease: 29-year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2020 to 2024Enrolled1,055ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsTransportation and Developmental Screening, Transportation, Screening, and Nurse-Visitation during Pregnancy and Infancy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Associations of Type 2 Diabetes with Risk of Overall and Site-Specific Cancers in a Cohort of Predominantly Low-Income Racially Diverse Populations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cardiometabolic Health and Bariatric Surgery: A 25-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study in CARDIA Participants.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael P BancksNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Kiarri KershawNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
April P CarsonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Penny Gordon-LarsenUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Pamela J SchreinerUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Mercedes R CarnethonNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELBERT S. HUANG · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN CVD EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTIONT32HL069771 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Mercedes Renee Carnethon · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Environmental Changes and Health Outcomes across 25 Years: Four US CitiesR01HL114091 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GORDON-LARSEN, PENNY · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200900041CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300026CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300027CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300028CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300029CNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114091NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069771NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In the United States, black individuals are twice as likely to develop type 2 diabetes compared with white individuals, and these disparities are particularly pronounced in young and middle age. Prior studies have identified differences in traditional risk factors that may be associated with racial disparities in diabetes incidence but have not simultaneously adjusted for risk factors measured across multiple domains (eg, the individual and the environment) and updated over time. Objective: To determine the relative associations of modifiable biological, neighborhood, psychosocial, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors in young adulthood with the observed racial disparity in diabetes incidence between middle-aged black and white individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Black and white men and women from the observational Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study, aged 18 to 30 years, without diabetes at baseline (1985-1986; N = 4251) were observed through 2015-2016. Sex-stratified multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling, with adjustment for time-updated covariates, was used to estimate risk for incident diabetes. Percent reduction in the β coefficient (the logarithm used to calculate the hazard ratio [HR]) was calculated to compare black to white participants. Exposures: Self-identified race and factors including biological (eg, fasting glucose, body mass index), neighborhood (racial segregation and tract-level poverty), psychosocial (depressive symptoms), socioeconomic (eg, personal and parental educational attainment, current employment), and behavioral (eg, regular alcohol consumption, smoking) domains. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results: The mean (SD) age at baseline was 25 (3.6) years, 49% (n = 2066) of the sample was black, and 54% (n = 2304) were women. Over a mean follow-up of 24.5 years, 504 cases of incident diabetes were identified. Using sex-stratified multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, black women and men were more likely to develop diabetes than white men and women (black women: HR, 2.86 [95% CI, 2.19-3.72] and risk difference [RD], 89 cases/1000 people [95% CI, 61-117]; black men: HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.28-2.17] and RD, 47 cases/1000 people [95% CI, 15-78]) after adjustment for age and center. Biological factors were most strongly associated with the disparity in diabetes risk between black and white individuals for women (percent reduction in β, 112%) and men (percent reduction in β, 86%). There was no longer disparity in diabetes risk between black and white middle-aged adults after adjustment for biological, neighborhood, psychosocial, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors measured over time (HR for women, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.55-1.14]; HR for men, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study comparing black and white participants, there was a statistically significant increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes among black women and men. However, after adjustment for modifiable risk factors during young adulthood, the disparity was no longer statistically significant.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHealth Status DisparitiesWhite PeopleAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsResidence CharacteristicsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsLipids

Identifiers

PMID29279935
PMCPMC5820714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.