Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29279933›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2017

Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Removal of Orthopedic Implants Used for Treatment of Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Manouk Backes, Siem A Dingemans, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, H Rogier van den Berg, Bart van Dijkman, Jochem M Hoogendoorn, Pieter Joosse, Ewan D Ritchie, W Herbert Roerdink, Judith P M Schots and 11 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02225821 (Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Wound Infections Following Implant Removal), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02225821 phase4completednot on this map

Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Wound Infections Following Implant Removal

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2014 to 2016Enrolled500ConditionsSurgical Wound InfectionArmsCephalozin, Sodium chloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Cost-effectiveness of on-demand removal of syndesmotic screws.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Post-operative infection following ankle fracture surgery: a current concepts review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  9. A single-centre, retrospective study on the impact of omitting preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infections in minor orthopedic implant removals.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. RSC advances · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A novel implant removal technique by endoscopy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Manouk BackesTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Siem A DingemansTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marcel G W DijkgraafClinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
H Rogier van den BergDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis East Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bart van DijkmanDepartment of Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands.
Jochem M HoogendoornDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Pieter JoosseDepartment of Surgery, Medical Center Alkmaar Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Ewan D RitchieDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital Leiderdorp, the Netherlands.
W Herbert RoerdinkDepartment of Surgery, Deventer Hospital Deventer, the Netherlands.
Judith P M SchotsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Nico L SosefDepartment of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
Ingrid J B SpijkermanDepartment of Microbiology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bas A TwigtDepartment of Surgery, BovenIJ Hospital Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexander H van der VeenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Ruben N van VeenDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis West Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jefrey VermeulenDepartment of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Haarlem, the Netherlands.
Dagmar I VosDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital Breda, the Netherlands.
Jasper WinkelhagenDepartment of Surgery, Westfries Gasthuis Hoorn, the Netherlands.
J Carel GoslingsTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tim SchepersTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
WIFI Collaboration Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial including 500 patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants from 19 hospitals (17 teaching and 2 academic) in the Netherlands (November 2014-September 2016), with a follow-up of 6 months (final follow-up, March 28, 2017). Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. Interventions: A single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among 477 randomized patients (mean age, 44 years [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile range, 7-16]), 470 patients completed the study. Sixty-six patients developed an SSI (14.0%): 30 patients (13.2%) in the cefazolin group vs 36 in the saline group (14.9%) (absolute risk difference, -1.7 [95% CI, -8.0 to 4.6], P = .60). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with saline did not reduce the risk of surgical site infection within 30 days following implant removal. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02225821.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinDevice RemovalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFractures, BoneHumansIncidenceInfusions, IntravenousIntention to Treat AnalysisInternal FixatorsLower ExtremityMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolin

Identifiers

PMID29279933
PMCPMC5820713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.