Trial reportJAMA2017
Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Removal of Orthopedic Implants Used for Treatment of Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02225821 (Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Wound Infections Following Implant Removal), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Wound Infections Following Implant Removal
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors contributing to postoperative surgical site infections in patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Plasma and tissue concentrations of 2 g prophylactic cefazolin prior to lower extremity surgery.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of on-demand removal of syndesmotic screws.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Trial
- [Possible complications following pilon fractures and their management].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma surgery and orthopedics].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Periprosthetic joint infection after arthroplasty: advances and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Analysis of risk factors, pathogenic bacteria characteristics, and drug resistance of postoperative surgical site infection in adults with limb fractures.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025Article
- Post-operative infection following ankle fracture surgery: a current concepts review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Review
- A single-centre, retrospective study on the impact of omitting preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infections in minor orthopedic implant removals.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Used in A University Clinics Hospital and Antibiotic Costs: A 3-year Survey.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2025Article
- Review
- The Effect of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Surgical Antibacterial Prophylaxis (SAP) at an Orthopedic Unit.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Surgical experience as a decisive factor for the outcome of calcaneal fractures using locking compression plate: results of 3 years.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Cefazolin Improves Anesthesia and Surgery-Induced Cognitive Impairments by Modulating Blood-Brain Barrier Function, Gut Bacteria and Short Chain Fatty Acids.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered locking nails for the treatment of fracture-related infections - A retrospective case analysis of 10 cases.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2019Article
- Preoperative disinfection of foot and ankle: microbiological evaluation of two disinfection methods.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2018Article
- A novel implant removal technique by endoscopy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Article
- Typo in the Discussion.JAMA · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial including 500 patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants from 19 hospitals (17 teaching and 2 academic) in the Netherlands (November 2014-September 2016), with a follow-up of 6 months (final follow-up, March 28, 2017). Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. Interventions: A single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among 477 randomized patients (mean age, 44 years [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile range, 7-16]), 470 patients completed the study. Sixty-six patients developed an SSI (14.0%): 30 patients (13.2%) in the cefazolin group vs 36 in the saline group (14.9%) (absolute risk difference, -1.7 [95% CI, -8.0 to 4.6], P = .60). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with saline did not reduce the risk of surgical site infection within 30 days following implant removal. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02225821.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.