Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29279860›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Cortical Neuroprosthesis Merges Visible and Invisible Light Without Impairing Native Sensory Function.

Eric E Thomson, Ivan Zea, William Windham, Yohann Thenaisie, Cameron Walker, Jason Pedowitz, Wendy França, Ana L Graneiro, Miguel A L Nicolelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Learning active sensing strategies using a sensory brain-machine interface.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric E ThomsonDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.
Ivan ZeaDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.
William WindhamDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.ORCID 0000-0003-4097-3926
Yohann ThenaisieDepartment of Biology, École Normale Supérieure De Lyon, Lyon, 69342, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-5821
Cameron WalkerDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-0393
Jason PedowitzSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.ORCID 0000-0002-9642-630X
Wendy FrançaDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.
Ana L GraneiroFlorida International University, Miami, FL 33199.ORCID 0000-0001-9132-9562
Miguel A L NicolelisDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.ORCID 0000-0002-5502-9324

Funding

TRIGEMINAL SYSTEM PLASTICITY DURING FACIAL ANESTHESIAR01DE011451 · NIDCR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 1994 to 2011
$2.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE011451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult rats equipped with a sensory prosthesis, which transduced infrared (IR) signals into electrical signals delivered to somatosensory cortex (S1), took approximately 4 d to learn a four-choice IR discrimination task. Here, we show that when such IR signals are projected to the primary visual cortex (V1), rats that are pretrained in a visual-discrimination task typically learn the same IR discrimination task on their first day of training. However, without prior training on a visual discrimination task, the learning rates for S1- and V1-implanted animals converged, suggesting there is no intrinsic difference in learning rate between the two areas. We also discovered that animals were able to integrate IR information into the ongoing visual processing stream in V1, performing a visual-IR integration task in which they had to combine IR and visual information. Furthermore, when the IR prosthesis was implanted in S1, rats showed no impairment in their ability to use their whiskers to perform a tactile discrimination task. Instead, in some rats, this ability was actually enhanced. Cumulatively, these findings suggest that cortical sensory neuroprostheses can rapidly augment the representational scope of primary sensory areas, integrating novel sources of information into ongoing processing while incurring minimal loss of native function.

Indexed as

Neural ProsthesesAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleLearningLightNeuronsRats, Long-EvansSomatosensory CortexTouch PerceptionVibrissaeVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual PerceptionBehaviormultisensory integrationneuroprosthesisplasticity

Identifiers

PMID29279860
PMCPMC5739531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.