Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29279383›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Impact of an historic underground gas well blowout on the current methane chemistry in a shallow groundwater system.

Gilian Schout, Niels Hartog, S Majid Hassanizadeh, Jasper Griffioen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Detecting and explaining why aquifers occasionally become degraded near hydraulically fractured shale gas wells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gilian SchoutCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; g.schout@uu.nl.
Niels HartogEarth Sciences Department, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S Majid HassanizadehEarth Sciences Department, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jasper GriffioenCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blowouts present a small but genuine risk when drilling into the deep subsurface and can have an immediate and significant impact on the surrounding environment. Nevertheless, studies that document their long-term impact are scarce. In 1965, a catastrophic underground blowout occurred during the drilling of a gas well in The Netherlands, which led to the uncontrolled release of large amounts of natural gas from the reservoir to the surface. In this study, the remaining impact on methane chemistry in the overlying aquifers was investigated. Methane concentrations higher than 10 mg/L (

Indexed as

anaerobic methane oxidationgroundwater contaminationisotopic fingerprintingmethanewell blowouts

Identifiers

PMID29279383
PMCPMC5777038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.