Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29279201›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2018

Replication in Imaging Genetics: The Case of Threat-Related Amygdala Reactivity.

Reut Avinun, Adam Nevo, Annchen R Knodt, Maxwell L Elliott, Ahmad R Hariri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A role for theThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reut AvinunLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: reut.avinun@duke.edu.
Adam NevoCardiothoracic Division, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Annchen R KnodtLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Maxwell L ElliottLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Ahmad R HaririLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Quantifying Individual Differences in Midlife Structural Brain Integrity Associated with Later AD/ADRD RiskR01AG049789 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AHMAD R. HARIRI, TERRIE E MOFFITT · 2015 to 2026
$10.6M
Self-Regulation Failure: Identifying and Modifying a Risk PhenotypeR01DA031579 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARIRI, AHMAD R., STRAUMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2010 to 2012
$1.9M
Neurogenetic Pathways to Drug Use in Young AdultsR01DA033369 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARIRI, AHMAD R. · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049789NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031579NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow replication rates are a concern in most, if not all, scientific disciplines. In psychiatric genetics specifically, targeting intermediate brain phenotypes, which are more closely associated with putative genetic effects, was touted as a strategy leading to increased power and replicability. In the current study, we attempted to replicate previously published associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms and threat-related amygdala reactivity, which represents a robust brain phenotype not only implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple disorders, but also used as a biomarker of future risk.

methodsWe conducted a literature search for published associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms and threat-related amygdala reactivity and found 37 unique findings. Our replication sample consisted of 1117 young adult volunteers (629 women, mean age 19.72 ± 1.25 years) for whom both genetic and functional magnetic resonance imaging data were available.

resultsOf the 37 unique associations identified, only three replicated as previously reported. When exploratory analyses were conducted with different model parameters compared to the original findings, significant associations were identified for 28 additional studies: eight of these were for a different contrast/laterality; five for a different gender and/or race/ethnicity; and 15 in the opposite direction and for a different contrast, laterality, gender, and/or race/ethnicity. No significant associations, regardless of model parameters, were detected for six studies. Notably, none of the significant associations survived correction for multiple comparisons.

conclusionsWe discuss these patterns of poor replication with regard to the general strategy of targeting intermediate brain phenotypes in genetic association studies and the growing importance of advancing the replicability of imaging genetics findings.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAmygdalaGenetic Association StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental DisordersPhenotypeAmygdalaFunctional MRIGenesImaging geneticsReplicationSingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID29279201
PMCPMC5955809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.