Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29278985›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2018

Structural and functional differences between porcine brain and budding yeast microtubules.

Stuart C Howes, Elisabeth A Geyer, Benjamin LaFrance, Rui Zhang, Elizabeth H Kellogg, Stefan Westermann, Luke M Rice, Eva Nogales

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Evolution of Tubulins in Diatoms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Separating the effects of nucleotide and EB binding on microtubule structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stuart C Howesa Biophysics Graduate Group , UC Berkeley , CA 94720 , USA and Department of Molecular Cell Biology , Leiden University Medical Center , 2333 ZC Leiden , Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6129-1882
Elisabeth A Geyerb UT Southwestern Medical Center , Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry , Dallas , TX 75390 , USA.
Benjamin LaFrancec Molecular and Cell Biology Graduate Program , UC Berkeley , CA 94720 , USA.
Rui Zhangd Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , CA 94720 , USA.
Elizabeth H Kelloggd Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , CA 94720 , USA.
Stefan Westermanng Research Institute of Molecular Pathology , Dr. Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna , Austria.
Luke M Riceb UT Southwestern Medical Center , Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry , Dallas , TX 75390 , USA.
Eva Nogalesd Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , CA 94720 , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9816-3681
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USBerkeley College · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · AT

Funding

THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF CELL FUNCTIONT32GM007232 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BILDER, DAVID, UNAL, ELCIN · 1985 to 2022
$36.4M
TUBULIN STRUCTURE BY ELECTRON CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP01GM051487 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CATE, JAMIE H · 1994 to 2018
$27.6M
CONFORMATION & RECOGNITION IN MICROTUBLE DYNAMICSR01GM098543 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICE, LUKE W · 2011 to 2023
$4.2M
Molecular Biophysics Predoctoral Training ProgramT32GM008297 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHOOK, YUH MIN · 1989 to 2018
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 003073NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM051487NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098543NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007232NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells relies on microtubules to perform many essential functions. We have previously shown that, in spite of the overall conservation in sequence and structure of tubulin subunits across species, there are differences between mammalian and budding yeast microtubules with likely functional consequences for the cell. Here we expand our structural and function comparison of yeast and porcine microtubules to show different distribution of protofilament number in microtubules assembled in vitro from these two species. The different geometry at lateral contacts between protofilaments is likely due to a more polar interface in yeast. We also find that yeast tubulin forms longer and less curved oligomers in solution, suggesting stronger tubulin:tubulin interactions along the protofilament. Finally, we observed species-specific plus-end tracking activity for EB proteins: yeast Bim1 tracked yeast but not mammalian MTs, and human EB1 tracked mammalian but not yeast MTs. These findings further demonstrate that subtle sequence differences in tubulin sequence can have significant structural and functional consequences in microtubule structure and behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainMicrotubulesSaccharomycetalesSpecies SpecificitySwineTubulinTubulinBim1budding yeastcryo-EMEBmicrotubulesTubulin

Identifiers

PMID29278985
PMCPMC5914886
OpenAlexW2777977824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.