Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29278774›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Quantitative assessment of structural image quality.

Adon F G Rosen, David R Roalf, Kosha Ruparel, Jason Blake, Kevin Seelaus, Lakshmi P Villa, Rastko Ciric, Philip A Cook, Christos Davatzikos, Mark A Elliott and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 285 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
285citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

285 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Heart rate variability (HRV) changes and cortical volume changes in a randomized trial of five weeks of daily HRV biofeedback in younger and older adults.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

225 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Adon F G RosenDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
David R RoalfDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Kosha RuparelDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Jason BlakeDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Kevin SeelausDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Lakshmi P VillaDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Rastko CiricDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Philip A CookDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Christos DavatzikosDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Mark A ElliottDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Angel Garcia de La GarzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Efstathios D GennatasDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Megan QuarmleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
J Eric SchmittDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Russell T ShinoharaDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
M Dylan TisdallDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
R Cameron CraddockCenter for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA; Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, USA.
Raquel E GurDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Ruben C GurDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Theodore D SatterthwaiteDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, USA. Electronic address: sattertt@upenn.edu.

Funding

Neurodevelopmental Genomics: Trajectories of Complex PhenotypesRC2MH089983 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E · 2009 to 2011
$14.3M
2/2 Neurodevelopmental Genomics: Trajectories of Complex PhenotypesRC2MH089924 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI HAKONARSON, HAKON · 2009 to 2011
$10.7M
Inter-modal Coupling Image AnalyticsR01MH112847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Theodore Satterthwaite, Russell Takeshi Shinohara · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
Mapping Heterogeneity of Neuroanatomical Imaging Signatures of Psychosis via Pattern AnalysisR01MH112070 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
Longitudinal multi-modal neuroimaging of irritability in youthR01MH107703 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2015 to 2018
$2.6M
Statistical methods for large and complex databases of ultra-high-dimensionalR01NS085211 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Multimodal brain maturation indices modulating psychopathology and neurocognitionR01MH107235 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RUBEN C. · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
Neurocognitive variability in schizophrenia and youth at-risk for psychosisK01MH102609 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROALF, DAVID R · 2014 to 2017
$685k
INGOT: a family of statistical computing algorithms for hypothesis-driven imaging genomic and longitudinal neuroimaging analysisK01ES026840 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHMITT, JAMES E · 2015 to 2017
$276k
NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026840NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH102609NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107235NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107703NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112070NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112847NIMH NIH HHS RC2 MH089924NIMH NIH HHS RC2 MH089983NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data quality is increasingly recognized as one of the most important confounding factors in brain imaging research. It is particularly important for studies of brain development, where age is systematically related to in-scanner motion and data quality. Prior work has demonstrated that in-scanner head motion biases estimates of structural neuroimaging measures. However, objective measures of data quality are not available for most structural brain images. Here we sought to identify quantitative measures of data quality for T1-weighted volumes, describe how these measures relate to cortical thickness, and delineate how this in turn may bias inference regarding associations with age in youth. Three highly-trained raters provided manual ratings of 1840 raw T1-weighted volumes. These images included a training set of 1065 images from Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC), a test set of 533 images from the PNC, as well as an external test set of 242 adults acquired on a different scanner. Manual ratings were compared to automated quality measures provided by the Preprocessed Connectomes Project's Quality Assurance Protocol (QAP), as well as FreeSurfer's Euler number, which summarizes the topological complexity of the reconstructed cortical surface. Results revealed that the Euler number was consistently correlated with manual ratings across samples. Furthermore, the Euler number could be used to identify images scored "unusable" by human raters with a high degree of accuracy (AUC: 0.98-0.99), and out-performed proxy measures from functional timeseries acquired in the same scanning session. The Euler number also was significantly related to cortical thickness in a regionally heterogeneous pattern that was consistent across datasets and replicated prior results. Finally, data quality both inflated and obscured associations with age during adolescence. Taken together, these results indicate that reliable measures of data quality can be automatically derived from T1-weighted volumes, and that failing to control for data quality can systematically bias the results of studies of brain maturation.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyQuality ControlAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexCohort StudiesDatasets as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingArtifactDevelopmentMotionMRIStructural imagingT1

Identifiers

PMID29278774
PMCPMC5856621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.