ArticleOnline social networks and media2017
Multi-class machine classification of suicide-related communication on Twitter.
Article in Online social networks and media, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights Derived From Text-Based Digital Media, in Relation to Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Using Data Analysis and Machine Learning: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2024Pooled it
- Methodologies for Monitoring Mental Health on Twitter: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Explainable Predictive Model for Suicidal Ideation During COVID-19: Social Media Discourse Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A machine learning approach to detect potentially harmful and protective suicide-related content in broadcast media.PloS one · 2024Article
- Association of 7 million+ tweets featuring suicide-related content with daily calls to the Suicide Prevention Lifeline and with suicides, United States, 2016-2018.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Suicide risk detection using artificial intelligence: the promise of creating a benchmark dataset for research on the detection of suicide risk.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Detecting Potentially Harmful and Protective Suicide-Related Content on Twitter: Machine Learning Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Review
- Exploring the Risk of Suicide in Real Time on Spanish Twitter: Observational Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Observational
- Methods to Establish Race or Ethnicity of Twitter Users: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Article
- Predicting acute suicidal ideation on Instagram using ensemble machine learning models.Internet interventions · 2021Article
- Information and Communication Technology Use in Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Factors Contributing to Adolescents' and Young Adults' Participation in Web-Based Challenges: Survey Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2021Article
- Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Intimate Partner Violence in Microblogs: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Observational
- Suicide Risk Assessment Using Machine Learning and Social Networks: a Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
- Testing Suicide Risk Prediction Algorithms Using Phone Measurements With Patients in Acute Mental Health Settings: Feasibility Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- A machine learning approach predicts future risk to suicidal ideation from social media data.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- Distress, Suicidality, and Affective Disorders at the Time of Social Networks.Current psychiatry reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The World Wide Web, and online social networks in particular, have increased connectivity between people such that information can spread to millions of people in a matter of minutes. This form of online collective contagion has provided many benefits to society, such as providing reassurance and emergency management in the immediate aftermath of natural disasters. However, it also poses a potential risk to vulnerable Web users who receive this information and could subsequently come to harm. One example of this would be the spread of suicidal ideation in online social networks, about which concerns have been raised. In this paper we report the results of a number of machine classifiers built with the aim of classifying text relating to suicide on Twitter. The classifier distinguishes between the more worrying content, such as suicidal ideation, and other suicide-related topics such as reporting of a suicide, memorial, campaigning and support. It also aims to identify flippant references to suicide. We built a set of baseline classifiers using lexical, structural, emotive and psychological features extracted from Twitter posts. We then improved on the baseline classifiers by building an ensemble classifier using the Rotation Forest algorithm and a Maximum Probability voting classification decision method, based on the outcome of base classifiers. This achieved an F-measure of 0.728 overall (for 7 classes, including suicidal ideation) and 0.69 for the suicidal ideation class. We summarise the results by reflecting on the most significant predictive principle components of the suicidal ideation class to provide insight into the language used on Twitter to express suicidal ideation. Finally, we perform a 12-month case study of suicide-related posts where we further evaluate the classification approach - showing a sustained classification performance and providing anonymous insights into the trends and demographic profile of Twitter users posting content of this type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.