Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29278215›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2018

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Elderly: Are Drug-coated Balloons the Future?

Ioannis Merinopoulos, Tharusha Gunawardena, Upul Wickramarachchi, Alisdair Ryding, Simon Eccleshall, Vassilios S Vassiliou

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon-only angioplasty for de novo coronary artery disease in elective clinical practice.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ioannis MerinopoulosDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Tharusha GunawardenaDepartment of Cardiology, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, United Kingdom.
Upul WickramarachchiDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Alisdair RydingDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Simon EccleshallDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Vassilios S VassiliouDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBIpswich Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBalloon angioplasty revolutionised percutaneous treatment for coronary artery disease four decades ago, but vessel-threatening dissections, elastic recoil and restenosis were major drawbacks to an otherwise successful long-lasting intervention. Subsequent advances with bare metal stents and then drug eluting stents followed, aiming to mitigate the risks of acute vessel closure and restenosis. However, stent implantation often necessitates dual antiplatelet therapy for a prolonged period of time, which in itself can lead to adverse outcomes, especially in the frail elderly population at higher risk of bleeding. More recently, bioabsorbable stents have been implemented in clinical practice enabling earlier intimal coverage of the stent and apposition. However, another addition to the armamentarium of percutaneous coronary intervention is the use of drug-coated balloons without the need for deploying any coronary stents or scaffolds. Drugcoated balloons are semi-compliant balloons coated with an antiproliferative agent that is rapidly released on contact with the vessel intima exerting an anti-restenotic effect. The absence of a metallic scaffold means that the need for antiplatelet therapy can potentially be negated in the longer term if required. In this article, we will review the history of percutaneous coronary intervention and the available evidence for the appropriate use of drug-coated balloons especially in the elderly population.

conclusionWe will conclude this review by demonstrating the potential use of drug-coated balloon rather percutaneous stenting through case examples.

Indexed as

AgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryDrug-Eluting StentsHumansMalePaclitaxelPercutaneous Coronary InterventionTreatment OutcomePaclitaxelCoronary artery diseasedrug-coated balloonselastic recoilelderlyrestenosis.vessel-threatening dissections

Identifiers

PMID29278215
PMCPMC5872262
OpenAlexW2776763780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.