Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29277450›Full record

ArticleVision research2018

Perceptual learning while preparing saccades.

Martin Rolfs, Nicholas Murray-Smith, Marisa Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptual learning across saccades: Feature but not location specific.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Learning to silence saccadic suppression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Eye movements shape visual learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin RolfsDepartment of Psychology, New York University, NY, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, USA; Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: martin.rolfs@hu-berlin.de.
Nicholas Murray-SmithDepartment of Psychology, New York University, NY, USA.
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology, New York University, NY, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MOVSHON, J ANTHONY · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
Effects of covert attention on early visionR01EY016200 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2006 to 2013
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional perceptual learning protocols rely almost exclusively on long periods of uninterrupted fixation. Taking a first step towards understanding perceptual learning in natural vision, we had observers report the orientation of a briefly flashed stimulus (clockwise or counterclockwise from a reference orientation) presented strictly during saccade preparation at a location offset from the saccade target. For each observer, the saccade direction, stimulus location, and orientation remained the same throughout training. Subsequently, we assessed performance during fixation in three transfer sessions, either at the trained or at an untrained location, and either using an untrained (Experiment 1) or the trained (Experiment 2) stimulus orientation. We modeled the evolution of contrast thresholds (i.e., the stimulus contrast necessary to discriminate its orientation correctly 75% of the time) as an exponential learning curve, and quantified departures from this curve in transfer sessions using two new, complementary measures of transfer costs (i.e., performance decrements after the transition into the Transfer phase). We observed robust perceptual learning and associated transfer costs for untrained locations and orientations. We also assessed if spatial transfer costs were reduced for the remapped location of the pre-saccadic stimulus-the location the stimulus would have had (but never had) after the saccade. Although the pattern of results at that location differed somewhat from that at the control location, we found no clear evidence for perceptual learning at remapped locations. Using novel, model-based ways to assess learning and transfer costs, our results show that location and feature specificity, hallmarks of perceptual learning, subsist if the target stimulus is presented strictly during saccade preparation throughout training.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionFemaleFixation, OcularHumansLearningMaleReaction TimeSaccadesVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAttentionEye movementsPerceptual learningPredictive remappingSaccade preparation

Identifiers

PMID29277450
PMCPMC6028304
OpenAlexW2782379406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.