Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29277248›Full record

ReviewHearing research2018

Communication pathways to and from the inner ear and their contributions to drug delivery.

Alec N Salt, Keiko Hirose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Audiovestibular manifestations of intracranial hypotension: a descriptive clinical series.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Observational
  8. Drug Discovery Targeting Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors for Hearing Loss.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alec N SaltDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: alecsalt@wustl.edu.
Keiko HiroseDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

INNER EAR FLUID INTERACTIONSR01DC001368 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SALT, ALEC N · 1992 to 2019
$6.9M
COCHLEAR MACROPHAGES AND EPITHELIAL REPAIRR01DC011315 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HIROSE, KEIKO · 2011 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001368NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environment of the inner ear is highly regulated in a manner that some solutes are permitted to enter while others are excluded or transported out. Drug therapies targeting the sensory and supporting cells of the auditory and vestibular systems require the agent to gain entry to the fluid spaces of the inner ear, perilymph or endolymph, which surround the sensory organs. Access to the inner ear fluids from the vasculature is limited by the blood-labyrinth barriers, which include the blood-perilymph and blood-strial barriers. Intratympanic applications provide an alternative approach in which drugs are applied locally. Drug from the applied solution enters perilymph through the round window membrane, through the stapes, and under some circumstances, through thin bone in the otic capsule. The amount of drug applied to the middle ear is always substantially more than the amount entering perilymph. As a result, significant amounts of the applied drug can pass to the digestive system, to the vasculature, and to the brain. Drugs in perilymph pass to the vasculature and to cerebrospinal fluid via the cochlear aqueduct. Conversely, drugs applied to cerebrospinal fluid, including those given intrathecally, can enter perilymph through the cochlear aqueduct. Other possible routes in or out of the ear include passage by neuronal pathways, passage via endolymph and the endolymphatic sac, and possibly via lymphatic pathways. A better understanding of the pathways for drug movements in and out of the ear will enable better intervention strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug Administration RoutesDrug CompoundingEar, InnerHumansPerilymphPermeabilityPharmaceutical PreparationsTissue DistributionPharmaceutical PreparationsCerebrospinal fluidCochleaIntratympanicPerilymphPharmacokineticsRound window

Identifiers

PMID29277248
PMCPMC5911243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.