Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29277176›Full record

ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2017

[Establishment and Optimization of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery System 
for Lung Cancer].

Guowei Che

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [Chinese Expert Consensus on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer (2024 Edition)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Clinical Effect of Day Surgery in Patients with Lung Caner by Optimize Operating Process].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [What is Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Humanity or Technology?]Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guowei CheDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of key techniques and programs, the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been utilized in a wide range of diseases and surgical specialties. The key technological elements of enhanced lung recovery after surgery (ELRAS), which is regarded as the mainstay of minimally invasive lung cancer surgery, consist of the airway management and the lung protection. A multidisciplinary team cooperation based on physicians, nurses and rehabilitative therapists is needed to achieve the goals of airway management and lung protection, thus establishing a comprehensive ELRAS system for lung cancer patients. Such ELRAS systems should meet the following demands: firstly, there are accurate and objective assessment models for each section in an ELRAS program; secondly, the ELRAS protocols should be made as simple and repeatable as possible; thirdly, there are rigorous evaluation systems for the clinical efficacy of an ELRAS program; finally, a question-oriented team should be constructed in an ELRAS program. In summary, the ELRAS system needs to be constantly optimized and improved in the clinical practices.

Indexed as

HumansLung NeoplasmsPulmonary Surgical ProceduresRecovery of FunctionEnhanced lung recovery after surgeryEnhanced recovery after surgeryLung neoplasmsLung surgery

Identifiers

PMID29277176
PMCPMC5973390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.