ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2018
An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians.
Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 67 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
141 citing papers in PubMed, 67 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- High-flow nasal cannula versus standard oxygen therapy for adult acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and GRADE assessment.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Telitacicept versus Belimumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of denosumab biosimilar and originator in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Pooled it
- Systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammation response index in systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Pooled it
- The Certainty of the Evidence on Plant- vs Meat-Predominant Dietary Patterns and Depression: An Umbrella Review.Nutrition reviews · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of yoga on posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of traumatic stress · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep in patients with critical illness: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping Systematic Reviews on the Management of Dental Caries in Primary Teeth: A Meta-research.Current pediatric reviews · 2026Pooled it
- All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.Neuroepidemiology · 2026Pooled it
- Cancer risk across sex, region, and disease subtype in ANCA-associated vasculitis patients : A meta-analysis.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of ferritin and glycosylated ferritin in adult-onset Still's disease: a meta-analysis.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of IgG 4/IgG and IgG 4 in patients with IgG 4-related disease: a meta-analysis.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of Baduanjin exercise on cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Association of IL-37 levels and genetic variants with systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Periodontitis as a risk factor for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of intra-articular opioid injections for managing temporomandibular joint nociception: a systematic review.Pain management · 2025Pooled it
- Influence of melatonin supplementation on cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Pooled it
- Association between chemokine genes polymorphisms and susceptibility to Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of water aerobics on body composition in obesity and overweight people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- A Meta-analysis of the Regulation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin-Kexin Type 9 with Inclisiran.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of medical studies being published is increasing exponentially, and clinicians must routinely process large amounts of new information. Moreover, the results of individual studies are often insufficient to provide confident answers, as their results are not consistently reproducible. A meta-analysis is a statistical method for combining the results of different studies on the same topic and it may resolve conflicts among studies. Meta-analysis is being used increasingly and plays an important role in medical research. This review introduces the basic concepts, steps, advantages, and caveats of meta-analysis, to help clinicians understand it in clinical practice and research. A major advantage of a meta-analysis is that it produces a precise estimate of the effect size, with considerably increased statistical power, which is important when the power of the primary study is limited because of a small sample size. A meta-analysis may yield conclusive results when individual studies are inconclusive. Furthermore, meta-analyses investigate the source of variation and different effects among subgroups. In summary, a meta-analysis is an objective, quantitative method that provides less biased estimates on a specific topic. Understanding how to conduct a meta-analysis aids clinicians in the process of making clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.