ArticleCurrent opinion in toxicology2017
Genetic and epigenetic determinants of inter-individual variability in responses to toxicants.
Article in Current opinion in toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using liver models generated from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for evaluating chemical-induced modifications and disease across liver developmental stages.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2022Review
- Intra- and Inter-Species Variability in Urinary N7-(1-Hydroxy-3-buten-2-yl)guanine Adducts Following Inhalation Exposure to 1,3-Butadiene.Chemical research in toxicology · 2021Article
- How do cancer-sniffing dogs sort biological samples? Exploring case-control samples with non-targeted LC-Orbitrap, GC-MS, and immunochemistry methods.Journal of breath research · 2019Article
- Drug-induced chromatin accessibility changes associate with sensitivity to liver tumor promotion.Life science alliance · 2019Article
- Population-Based Analysis of DNA Damage and Epigenetic Effects of 1,3-Butadiene in the Mouse.Chemical research in toxicology · 2019Article
- Tissue- and strain-specific effects of a genotoxic carcinogen 1,3-butadiene on chromatin and transcription.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well established that genetic variability has a major impact on susceptibility to common diseases, responses to drugs and toxicants, and influences disease-related outcomes. The appreciation that epigenetic marks also vary across the population is growing with more data becoming available from studies in humans and model organisms. In addition, the links between genetic variability, toxicity outcomes and epigenetics are being actively explored. Recent studies demonstrate that gene-by-environment interactions involve both chromatin states and transcriptional regulation, and that epigenetics provides important mechanistic clues to connect expression-related quantitative trait loci (QTL) and disease outcomes. However, studies of Gene×Environment×Epigenetics further extend the complexity of the experimental designs and create a challenge for selecting the most informative epigenetic readouts that can be feasibly performed to interrogate multiple individuals, exposures, tissue types and toxicity phenotypes. We propose that among the many possible epigenetic experimental methodologies, assessment of chromatin accessibility coupled with total RNA levels provides a cost-effective and comprehensive option to sufficiently characterize the complexity of epigenetic and regulatory activity in the context of understanding the inter-individual variability in responses to toxicants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.