Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29276550›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2017

INFERENCE FOR SOCIAL NETWORK MODELS FROM EGOCENTRICALLY SAMPLED DATA, WITH APPLICATION TO UNDERSTANDING PERSISTENT RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HIV PREVALENCE IN THE US.

Pavel N Krivitsky, Martina Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Review of Network Models for HIV Spread.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Moana: Alternate surveillance for COVID-19 in a Unique Population (MASC-UP).Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Improving and Extending STERGM Approximations Based on Cross-Sectional Data and Tie Durations.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Female cooperative labour networks in hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavel N Krivitsky
Martina Morris

Funding

Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
Statistical Methods for Network EpidemiologyR01HD068395 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MORRIS, WANDA MARTINA · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Seattle HIV/AIDS modeling for PreventionR21AI124789 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MORRIS, WANDA MARTINA · 2016 to 2017
$425k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI124789NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Egocentric network sampling observes the network of interest from the point of view of a set of sampled actors, who provide information about themselves and anonymized information on their network neighbors. In survey research, this is often the most practical, and sometimes the only, way to observe certain classes of networks, with the sexual networks that underlie HIV transmission being the archetypal case. Although methods exist for recovering some descriptive network features, there is no rigorous and practical statistical foundation for estimation and inference for network models from such data. We identify a subclass of exponential-family random graph models (ERGMs) amenable to being estimated from egocentrically sampled network data, and apply pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimation to do so and to rigorously quantify the uncertainty of the estimates. For ERGMs parametrized to be invariant to network size, we describe a computationally tractable approach to this problem. We use this methodology to help understand persistent racial disparities in HIV prevalence in the US. We also discuss some extensions, including how our framework may be applied to triadic effects when data about ties among the respondent's neighbors are also collected.

Indexed as

egocentrically-sampled dataERGMpseudo likelihoodpseudo maximum likelihoodrandom graphsocial network

Identifiers

PMID29276550
PMCPMC5737754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.