Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29276424›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2017

Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams.

Lindsay Bank, Mariëlle Jippes, Jimmie Leppink, Albert Jja Scherpbier, Corry den Rooyen, Scheltus J van Luijk, Fedde Scheele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Schools' Readiness for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education: an Overview of Theoretical Models.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Change Management in Medical Contexts, especially in Medical Education: A Systematized Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsay BankDepartment of Healthcare Education, OLVG Hospital.
Mariëlle JippesDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam.
Jimmie LeppinkFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht.
Albert Jja ScherpbierFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht.
Corry den RooyenMovation BV, Maarssen.
Scheltus J van LuijkDepartment of Healthcare Education, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht.
Fedde ScheeleDepartment of Healthcare Education, OLVG Hospital.
Maastricht University · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLMovation (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurriculum change and innovation are inevitable parts of progress in postgraduate medical education (PGME). Although implementing change is known to be challenging, change management principles are rarely looked at for support. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for the successful implementation of change initiatives. Therefore, this study explores whether assessing ORC in clinical teaching teams could help to understand how curriculum change takes place in PGME.

methodsClinical teaching teams in hospitals in the Netherlands were requested to complete the Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change, a questionnaire to measure ORC in clinical teaching teams. In addition, change-related behavior was measured by using the "behavioral support-for-change" measure. A two-way analysis of variance was performed for all response variables of interest.

resultsIn total, 836 clinical teaching team members were included in this study: 288 (34.4%) trainees, 307 (36.7%) clinical staff members, and 241 (28.8%) program directors. Overall, items regarding whether the program director has the authority to lead scored higher compared with the other items. At the other end, the subscales "management support and leadership," "project resources," and "implementation plan" had the lowest scores in all groups. DISCUSSION: The study brought to light that program directors are clearly in the lead when it comes to the implementation of educational innovation. Clinical teaching teams tend to work together as a team, sharing responsibilities in the implementation process. However, the results also reinforce the need for change management support in change processes in PGME.

Indexed as

change managementcurriculum changeinnovationorganizational readiness for changepostgraduate medical educationquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID29276424
PMCPMC5733925
OpenAlexW2772317318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.