Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29276414›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2017

Perceptions and practice of epidural analgesia among women attending antenatal clinic in FETHA.

Paul O Ezeonu, Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie, Fidelis A Onu, Chidi U Esike, Johnbosco E Mamah, Lucky O Lawani, Robinson C Onoh, Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe, Richard Lawrence Ewah, Rita Onyinyechi Anozie

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07473609 (Analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Epidural Analgesia Failure During Labor), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07473609 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Epidural Analgesia Failure During Labor: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNicolas BroglyRan2026 to 2027Enrolled500ConditionsFailed Epidural Analgesia, Post-partum RecoveryArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perinatal depression.International anesthesiology clinics · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paul O EzeonuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Okechukwu Bonaventure AnozieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Fidelis A OnuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Chidi U EsikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Johnbosco E MamahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Lucky O LawaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Robinson C OnohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Emmanuel Okechukwu NdukweDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Richard Lawrence EwahDepartment of Anaesthesia.
Rita Onyinyechi AnozieDepartment of Radiology, Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pain of childbirth is arguably the most severe pain that most women will endure in their lifetime. Epidural analgesia is widely used as an effective method of pain relief in labor. It provides almost complete relief of pain if administered timely, and does not affect the progress of the first stage labor.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to determine the awareness and utilization of epidural analgesia in labor in pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki (FETHA). METHODOLOGY: This is a cross-sectional study involving 350 women attending the antenatal clinic between April 2016 and July 2016. A total of 335 questionnaires were correctly completed, and used for analysis.

resultsThe average age and parity of the respondents were 27.6±8.2 years and 2.4±1.8, respectively. About 58.2% of respondents were civil servants, 98.5% were married, and 74.6% had a tertiary level of education. About 43.3% of the respondents are aware of the use of epidural analgesia in labor, but only 7.5% had used it; 95% of these were satisfied and desired to use it again. The reasons responsible for the poor uptake were desire to experience natural labor, cost, and fear of side effects. However, 70% of those who had not used it expressed the desire to use it.

conclusionEpidural analgesia is one of the most effective methods of pain relief in labor. However, the present study indicates that knowledge and practice of epidural analgesia among parturients are low. Efforts should be made to raise awareness, dispel misconceptions, and subsidize the cost of providing this invaluable care in modern day obstetrics.

Indexed as

epidurallabor painobstetric analgesiaperceptionpractice

Identifiers

PMID29276414
PMCPMC5731435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.