Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29276317›Full record

ArticleAquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2017

Cryobanking of aquatic species.

Sonia Martínez-Páramo, Ákos Horváth, Catherine Labbé, Tiantian Zhang, Vanesa Robles, Paz Herráez, Marc Suquet, Serean Adams, Ana Viveiros, Terrence R Tiersch and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Development of Cells Repository ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cryoinjuries in Cryopreserved Semen ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sonia Martínez-PáramoCCMAR-Centre of Marine Sciences, University of Algarve, Campus Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Ákos HorváthDepartment of Aquaculture, Szent István University, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Catherine LabbéINRA, Fish Physiology and Genomics, Campus de Beaulieu, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Tiantian ZhangFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, United Kingdom.
Vanesa RoblesIEO, Spanish Oceanographic Institute, Santander Oceanographic Centre, El Bocal, Barrio Corbanera s/n Bocal, 39012 Monte, Santander, Spain.
Paz HerráezDepartment of Molecular Biology and INDEGSAL, University of León, 24071 León, Spain.
Marc SuquetIFREMER, PFOM Dept, Stn Expt Argenton, UMR, 6539 Argenton, France.
Serean AdamsCawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042, New Zealand.
Ana ViveirosDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, UFLA, MG 37200-000, Brazil.
Terrence R TierschAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Elsa CabritaCCMAR-Centre of Marine Sciences, University of Algarve, Campus Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.

Funding

Enhanced Development of the Xiphophorus Model System R24-OD-011120R24OD011120 · OD · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER, RONALD B · 2012 to 2019
$5.3M
Development of Germplasm Resources for Preservation of Aquatic ModelsR24OD010441 · OD · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI BLACKBURN, HARVEY D., MONROE, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
NIH HHS R24 OD010441NIH HHS R24 OD011120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is focused on the applications of genome cryobanking of aquatic species including freshwater and marine fish, as well as invertebrates. It also reviews the latest advances in cryobanking of model species, widely used by the scientific community worldwide, because of their applications in several fields. The state of the art of cryopreservation of different cellular types (sperm, oocytes, embryos, somatic cells and primordial germ cells or early spermatogonia) is discussed focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure according to different applications. A special review on the need of standardization of protocols has also been carried out. In summary, this comprehensive review provides information on the practical details of applications of genome cryobanking in a range of aquatic species worldwide, including the cryobanks established in Europe, USA, Brazil, Australia and New Zealand, the species and type of cells that constitute these banks and the utilization of the samples preserved. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: This review compiles the last advances on germplasm cryobanking of freshwater and marine fish species and invertebrates, with high value for commercial aquaculture or conservation. It is reviewed the most promising cryopreservation protocols for different cell types, embryos and larvae that could be applied in programs for genetic improvement, broodstock management or conservation of stocks to guarantee culture production.

Indexed as

Aquatic animalsCryobankingFish gametesGermplasm

Identifiers

PMID29276317
PMCPMC5737826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.