ArticleHospital pharmacy2017
Bivalirudin Medication Use Evaluation and Cost Savings Initiative.
Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bivalirudin is a parenteral anticoagulant that elicits its effect through inhibition of both free and clot bound-thrombin. Inhibition of thrombin serves as a unique mechanism for anticoagulation when compared to heparin as thrombin serves as the final common pathway for the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cascades. Due to unclear benefit over heparin, concerns regarding reversibility, and most importantly cost its use as a parenteral anticoagulant varies by institution. A recent drug expenditure review within our institution noted a significant increase in the contribution bivalirudin had on the overall drug budget. In an effort to establish the rationale for the cost increase, a medication use evaluation was performed. While it was discovered that 625 out of 1364 days of bivalirudin therapy were potentially avoidable, an equally important discovery was the amount of waste that was associated with bivalirudin therapy. Calculating daily requirements for bivalirudin indicated that 60% of patients required less than 100 mg per day. Within this article, we describe a cost-savings initiative to reduce bivalirudin waste and the resulting cost-avoidance following implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.