Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29276038›Full record

ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2018

Structural and Dynamics Comparison of Thermostability in Ancient, Modern, and Consensus Elongation Factor Tus.

C Denise Okafor, Manish C Pathak, Crystal E Fagan, Nicholas C Bauer, Megan F Cole, Eric A Gaucher, Eric A Ortlund

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The Structural and Molecular Mechanisms ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Early divergence of translation initiation and elongation factors.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  8. The stability and dynamics of computationally designed proteins.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protein ensembles link genotype to phenotype.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C Denise OkaforDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Manish C PathakDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Crystal E FaganDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Nicholas C BauerDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Megan F ColeSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Eric A GaucherSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Eric A OrtlundDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: eortlun@emory.edu.
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

IRACDA Fellowships in Research and Science Training (FIRST)K12GM000680 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, LOU ANN S, MCCARTY, NAEL A · 2000 to 2024
$41.2M
Training Program in Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular BiologyT32GM008367 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOISE, LAWRENCE H., CORBETT, ANITA H. · 1990 to 2019
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000680NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationally engineering thermostability in proteins would create enzymes and receptors that function under harsh industrial applications. Several sequence-based approaches can generate thermostable variants of mesophilic proteins. To gain insight into the mechanisms by which proteins become more stable, we use structural and dynamic analyses to compare two popular approaches, ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) and the consensus method, used to generate thermostable variants of Elongation Factor Thermo-unstable (EF-Tu). We present crystal structures of ancestral and consensus EF-Tus, accompanied by molecular dynamics simulations aimed at probing the strategies employed to enhance thermostability. All proteins adopt crystal structures similar to extant EF-Tus, revealing no difference in average structure between the methods. Molecular dynamics reveals that ASR-generated sequences retain dynamic properties similar to extant, thermostable EF-Tu from Thermus aquaticus, while consensus EF-Tu dynamics differ from evolution-based sequences. This work highlights the advantage of ASR for engineering thermostability while preserving natural motions in multidomain proteins.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCloning, MolecularConsensus SequenceCrystallography, X-RayEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsGuanosine DiphosphateMolecular Dynamics SimulationPeptide Elongation Factor TuPhylogenyProtein BindingBacterial ProteinsGuanosine DiphosphatePeptide Elongation Factor TuProtein IsoformsRecombinant Proteinsancestral sequence reconstructionmolecular dynamicsprotein thermostabilitystructural biologyX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID29276038
PMCPMC5785943
OpenAlexW2779031823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.