Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29276017›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Public health2018

Evaluation of the effect of the herpes zoster vaccination programme 3 years after its introduction in England: a population-based study.

Gayatri Amirthalingam, Nick Andrews, Philip Keel, David Mullett, Ana Correa, Simon de Lusignan, Mary Ramsay

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gayatri AmirthalingamImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK. Electronic address: gayatri.amirthalingam@phe.gov.uk.
Nick AndrewsStatistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Philip KeelImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
David MullettRoyal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, London, UK; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Ana CorreaRoyal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, London, UK; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Simon de LusignanRoyal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, London, UK; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Mary RamsayImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Public Health England · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBRoyal College of General Practitioners · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2013, a herpes zoster vaccination programme was introduced in England for adults aged 70 years with a phased catch-up programme for those aged 71-79 years. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the first 3 years of the vaccination programme on incidence of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in this population.

methodsIn this population-based study, we extracted data from the Royal College of General Practitioners sentinel primary care network on consultations with patients aged 60-89 years for herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia occurring between Oct 1, 2005, and Sept 30, 2016, obtaining data from 164 practices. We identified individual data on herpes zoster vaccinations administered and consultations for herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia, and aggregated these data to estimate vaccine coverage and incidence of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia consultations. We defined age cohorts to identify participants targeted in each year of the programme, and as part of the routine or catch-up programme. We modelled incidence according to age, region, gender, time period, and vaccine eligibility using multivariable Poisson regression with an offset for person-years.

findingsOur analysis included 3·36 million person-years of data, corresponding to an average of 310 001 patients aged 60-89 years who were registered at an RCGP practice each year. By Aug 31, 2016, uptake of the vaccine varied between 58% for the recently targeted cohorts and 72% for the first routine cohort. Across the first 3 years of vaccination for the three routine cohorts, incidence of herpes zoster fell by 35% (incidence rate ratio 0·65 [95% 0·60-0·72]) and of postherpetic neuralgia fell by 50% (0·50 [0·38-0·67]). The equivalent reduction for the four catch-up cohorts was 33% for herpes zoster (incidence rate ratio 0·67 [0·61-0·74]) and 38% for postherpetic neuralgia (0·62 [0·50-0·79]). These reductions are consistent with a vaccine effectiveness of about 62% against herpes zoster and 70-88% against postherpetic neuralgia.

interpretationThe herpes zoster vaccination programme in England has had a population impact equivalent to about 17 000 fewer episodes of herpes zoster and 3300 fewer episodes of postherpetic neuralgia among 5·5 million eligible individuals in the first 3 years of the programme. Communication of the public health impact of this programme will be important to reverse the recent trend of declining vaccine coverage.

fundingPublic Health England.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHerpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgia, PostherpeticProgram EvaluationHerpes Zoster Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID29276017
PMCPMC5846879
OpenAlexW2778116823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.