ArticleSexual medicine2018
EDEUS, a Real-Life Study on the Users of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors: Prevalence, Perceptions, and Health Care-Seeking Behavior Among European Men With a Focus on 2nd-Generation Avanafil.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-generation pharmaceuticals: the rise of sildenafil citrate ODF for the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction.Therapeutic delivery · 2025Review
- News and future perspectives of non-surgical treatments for erectile dysfunction.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS), along with ten other Italian Scientific Societies, guidelines on the diagnosis and management of erectile dysfunction.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2023Article
- Web based research in sexual medicine: a position statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.Sexual medicine · 2023Review
- Effect of the new 75-mg orodispersible film of sildenafil on erection and sexual quality of life: insights from an observational study.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Evidence for benefits and risks of tadalafil as a non-prescription medicine: review and evaluation using the Group Delphi technique to achieve consensus amongst clinical experts.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- The Role of the "Anti-Inflammatory" Couple for the Management of Hyperuricemia With Deposition.Sexual medicine · 2022Review
- Orodispersible Film (ODF) Platform Based on Maltodextrin for Therapeutical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Efficacy Evaluation of Plant Products in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction Related to Diabetes.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Facing Counterfeit Medications in Sexual Medicine. A Systematic Scoping Review on Social Strategies and Technological Solutions.Sexual medicine · 2021Article
- The Use of Vasoactive Drugs in the Treatment of Male Erectile Dysfunction: Current Concepts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- The Sentiment Analysis of Tweets as a New Tool to Measure Public Perception of Male Erectile and Ejaculatory Dysfunctions.Sexual medicine · 2019Article
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Workup of Erectile Dysfunction: Results From a Delphi Consensus of Andrology Experts.Sexual medicine · 2019Article
- Needs and Expectations of Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: An Update on Pharmacological Innovations in Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibition with Focus on Sildenafil.Sexual medicine · 2019Review
- Recreational use of oral erectile dysfunction medications among male physicians - A cross-sectional study.Urology annalsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionErectile dysfunction (ED) is a multidimensional disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1% to 10% in men younger than 40 years and up to 100% in men in their 70s and 80s.
aimTo evaluate the real-life characteristics and unmet needs of men with ED, its impact on well-being, and treatment rates across Europe.
methodsAdult men in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, and Spain were invited to participate in the survey. Men who did not use at least a drug for sexual health in the past 3 months, had cancer or spinal cord injuries, and/or underwent non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy were excluded.
main outcome measuresThe 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) with study-specific, self-constructed questions was used.
resultsOverall, 940 subjects (age = 46.2 ± 13.4 years) were considered. Subjects (n = 778) using on-demand phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) were designated "performers" (60%) without a formal ED diagnosis or "patients" with a medical diagnosis. Patients were older than performers, with more self-reported comorbidities; patients used a higher PDE5i dosage and purchased it from official pharmacies more often than performers did. Of avanafil users (n = 39), no differences in total IIEF or subdomain scores were observed after adjusting for confounders. However, avanafil users less often declared its use without an ED diagnosis and a physician prescription. Overall, the latter condition was associated with higher PDE5i-related satisfaction.
conclusionThe survey shows 2 different attitudes toward ED and PDE5i use: for recreational use and without a medical prescription or with a formal diagnosis and medical prescription. Avanafil, a 2nd-generation PDE5i with a good balance between efficacy and tolerability profile, is more frequently prescribed by doctors than self-prescribed compared with other PDE5is. Because the major challenge is to decrease the high dropout of 1st-generation PDE5is, further studies will be needed to clarify this topic. Corona G, Maggi M, Jannini EA. EDEUS, a Real-Life Study on the Users of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors: Prevalence, Perceptions, and Health Care-Seeking Behavior Among European Men With a Focus on 2nd-Generation Avanafil. Sex Med 2018;6:15-23.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.