Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29275813›Full record

ReviewSeminars in pediatric surgery2018

The science and necessity of using animal models in the study of necrotizing enterocolitis.

Guillermo J Ares, Steven J McElroy, Catherine J Hunter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in pediatric surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: What's New and What's Next?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Necrotizing enterocolitis causes increased ileal goblet cell loss inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Paneth cell ontogeny in term and preterm ovine models.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Vitamin DTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. State-of-the-art review and update ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillermo J AresDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Steven J McElroyDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Catherine J HunterDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: chunter@luriechildrens.org.

Funding

Defining bacterial virulence, cAMP and PKA in necrotizing enterocolitisK08DK106450 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI HUNTER, CATHERINE JANE · 2015 to 2021
$851k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK106450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains one of the highest causes of mortality and of acute and long-term morbidity in premature infants. Multiple factors are involved in the pathophysiology of NEC including the immaturity of the immune system and the complex changing composition of the intestinal microbiome. This is compounded by the fact that the premature infant should ideally still be a developing fetus and has an immature intestinal tract. Because these complexities are beyond the scope of studies in single-cell cultures, animal models are absolutely essential to understand the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of NEC and the effects of inflammation on the immature intestinal tract. To this end, investigators have utilized many different species (e.g., rats, mice, rabbits, quails, piglets, and non-human primates) and conditions to develop models of NEC. Each animal has distinct advantages and drawbacks related to its preterm viability, body size, genetic variability, and cost. The choice of animal model is strongly influenced by the scientific question being addressed. While no model perfectly mimics human NEC, each has greatly improved our understanding of disease. Examples of recent discoveries in NEC pathogenesis and prevention underscore the importance of continued animal research in NEC.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsEnterocolitis, NecrotizingMiceRatsSwineAnimal modelsFormulaHypoxiaNecrotizing enterocolitisPigletRodent

Identifiers

PMID29275813
PMCPMC5745061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.